From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] 3.15-rc5: Regression in i915 driver?
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:07:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140519070705.GA8790@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140518191338.GA11754@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:13:38PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 09:08:40PM +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 12.05.2014, 07:33 +0100 schrieb Chris Wilson:
> > > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 07:40:57PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 11 May 2014 18:28, Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> wrote:
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 3.14.3 works as expected.
> > > > >> 3.15-rc5 shows a strange behaviour: When resuming from ram the X server
> > > > >> seems to be disfunctional.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I see this WARNING in the kernel log before suspend to ram in the early
> > > > >> boot process:
> > > >
> > > > Doesn't ring a bell really.
> > >
> > > Same symptoms as
> > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76554
> > > -Chris
> > >
> >
> > bisected this to:
> > # first bad commit: [78f2975eec9faff353a6194e854d3d39907bab68] drm/i915: Move all ring resets before setting the HWS page
> >
> > commit 78f2975eec9faff353a6194e854d3d39907bab68
> > Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Date: Wed Apr 2 16:36:07 2014 +0100
> >
> > drm/i915: Move all ring resets before setting the HWS page
> >
> > In commit a51435a3137ad8ae75c288c39bd2d8b2696bae8f
> > Author: Naresh Kumar Kachhi <naresh.kumar.kachhi@intel.com>
> > Date: Wed Mar 12 16:39:40 2014 +0530
> >
> > drm/i915: disable rings before HW status page setup
> >
> > we reordered stopping the rings to do so before we set the HWS register.
> > However, there is an extra workaround for g45 to reset the rings twice,
> > and for consistency we should apply that workaround before setting the
> > HWS to be sure that the rings are truly stopped.
> >
> > Reference: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140423202248.GA3621@amd.pavel.ucw.cz
> > Tested-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > Cc: Naresh Kumar Kachhi <naresh.kumar.kachhi@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> >
> > Reverting above commit from current linus' master tree makes the display server behave correctly after resume from ram.
>
> Boot time regression trumps resume regression? Doubly-so as we have an
> earlier resume regression with identical symptoms?
I'll check on my gm45 - that has has become much more crashy ime in 3.15
somehow, with ring init failures.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-19 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-11 8:28 3.15-rc5: Regression in i915 driver? Thomas Meyer
2014-05-11 9:02 ` Dave Airlie
2014-05-11 17:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-12 6:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2014-05-12 16:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-18 19:08 ` Thomas Meyer
2014-05-18 19:13 ` Chris Wilson
2014-05-19 7:07 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-06-14 15:30 ` Thomas Meyer
2014-05-12 7:09 ` Jani Nikula
2014-05-12 16:54 ` Daniel Vetter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-17 17:43 Thomas Meyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140519070705.GA8790@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas@m3y3r.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox