Re: [PATCH] sched/dl: Fix race between dl_task_timer() and sched_setaffinity()

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1272 bytes --]

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 01:33:42PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> [PATCH] sched/dl: Fix race in dl_task_timer()
> 
> Throttled task is still on rq, and it may be moved to other cpu
> if user is playing with sched_setaffinity(). Therefore, unlocked
> task_rq() access makes the race.
> 
> Juri Lelli reports he got this race when dl_bandwidth_enabled()
> was not set.
> 
> Other thing, pointed by Peter Zijlstra:
> 
>    "Now I suppose the problem can still actually happen when
>     you change the root domain and trigger a effective affinity
>     change that way".
> 
> To fix that we do the same as made in __task_rq_lock(). We do not
> use __task_rq_lock() itself, because it has a useful lockdep check,
> which is not correct in case of dl_task_timer(). We do not need
> pi_lock locked here. This case is an exception (PeterZ):
> 
>    "The only reason we don't strictly need ->pi_lock now is because
>     we're guaranteed to have p->state == TASK_RUNNING here and are
>     thus free of ttwu races".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
> CC: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.14
> ---

thanks Kirill!

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]