From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Diehl <thorsten.diehl@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: /proc/stat vs. failed order-4 allocation
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 07:32:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140521143229.GA32011@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140521122521.GB7471@osiris>
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:25:21PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm just wondering why /proc/stat is a single_open() seq_file and not a
> regular seq_file with an iterator (say 48 online cpus for each iteration
> or something similar).
Probably because no one sent a patch for it. I'm pretty sure it used the
even more horrible old proc ops before and was converted in batch with
various other files.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-21 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-21 12:25 /proc/stat vs. failed order-4 allocation Heiko Carstens
2014-05-21 14:32 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-05-22 3:05 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-05-28 8:58 ` Heiko Carstens
2014-05-28 8:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: proc/stat: use num_online_cpus() for buffer size Heiko Carstens
2014-05-28 11:06 ` Ian Kent
2014-05-28 11:14 ` Ian Kent
2014-05-28 9:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: proc/stat: use usual seq_file ops rather than single_open Heiko Carstens
2014-05-28 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-30 8:38 ` Heiko Carstens
2014-05-30 11:36 ` [PATCH] fs: proc/stat: use seq_file iterator interface Heiko Carstens
2014-06-09 8:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: proc/stat: use usual seq_file ops rather than single_open Ian Kent
2014-06-11 12:43 ` Heiko Carstens
2014-06-11 22:29 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-12 6:24 ` Ian Kent
2014-06-12 6:52 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-12 7:27 ` Heiko Carstens
2014-06-12 8:18 ` Heiko Carstens
2014-06-12 20:59 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-12 11:09 ` Ian Kent
2014-05-22 11:29 ` /proc/stat vs. failed order-4 allocation Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140521143229.GA32011@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea@betterlinux.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thorsten.diehl@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).