From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
gong.chen@linux.intel.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Elliott@hp.com, thomas.mingarelli@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86, nmi: Move default external NMI handler to its own routine
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:48:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140521164848.GZ50500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140521103846.GA2485@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:38:46PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 03:25:48PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > Now that we have setup an NMI subtye called NMI_EXT, there is really
> > no need to hard code the default external NMI handler in the main
> > nmi handler routine.
> >
> > Move it to a proper function and register it on boot. This change is
> > just code movement.
> >
> > In addition, update the hpwdt to allow it to unregister the default
> > handler on its registration (and vice versa). This allows the driver
> > to take control of that io port (which it ultimately wanted to do
> > originally), but in a cleaner way.
>
> wanting that is one thing, but is it also a sane thing? You don't do
> thing just because drivers want it.
Heh. I understand.
Today, I have hacked up the SERR and IOCHK handlers to give hpwdt the
chance to do its 'magic' bios call to collect information before
panic'ing.
I was trying to clean things up by removing those hacks, but I guess I can
see your point, there is no guarantee they handle the hardware correctly.
:-/
Cheers,
Don
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-21 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-15 19:25 [PATCH 0/6 V2] x86, nmi: Various fixes and cleanups Don Zickus
2014-05-15 19:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86, nmi: Implement delayed irq_work mechanism to handle lost NMIs Don Zickus
2014-05-21 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-21 16:45 ` Don Zickus
2014-05-21 17:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-21 19:02 ` Don Zickus
2014-05-21 19:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-15 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86, nmi: Add new nmi type 'external' Don Zickus
2014-05-15 19:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86, nmi: Add boot line option 'panic_on_unrecovered_nmi' and 'panic_on_io_nmi' Don Zickus
2014-05-15 19:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86, nmi: Remove 'reason' value from unknown nmi output Don Zickus
2014-05-15 19:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86, nmi: Move default external NMI handler to its own routine Don Zickus
2014-05-21 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-21 16:48 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2014-05-21 18:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-21 19:13 ` Don Zickus
2014-05-15 19:25 ` [PATCH 6/6 V2] x86, nmi: Add better NMI stats to /proc/interrupts and show handlers Don Zickus
2014-05-15 20:28 ` [PATCH 0/6 V2] x86, nmi: Various fixes and cleanups Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140521164848.GZ50500@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=Elliott@hp.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.mingarelli@hp.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox