From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] workqueue: Allow changing attributions of ordered workqueues
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:18:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140521191850.GD5259@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537C55C4.70706@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hey,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:29:08PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Should we reorder the pwq_adjust_max_active() to avoid this declare?
> (Move pwq_adjust_max_active() to the place just before rcu_free_pwq())
Yeah, sure. Sounds good to me.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-21 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-16 16:16 [RFC PATCH 0/5] workqueue: Introduce low-level unbound wq sysfs cpumask v3 Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-16 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] workqueue: Allow changing attributions of ordered workqueues Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-16 20:12 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-17 13:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-19 20:15 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20 14:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-20 14:35 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20 15:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-21 7:29 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-05-21 19:18 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-05-16 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] workqueue: Reorder sysfs code Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-16 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: Create low-level unbound workqueues cpumask Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-16 17:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-16 18:35 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-16 18:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-16 19:00 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-16 19:22 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-16 19:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-16 19:34 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-16 19:45 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-16 23:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-16 23:48 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-17 22:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-18 2:51 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-16 16:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] workqueue: Split apply attrs code from its locking Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-16 16:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: Allow modifying low level unbound workqueue cpumask Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-16 20:50 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20 19:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-05-20 19:56 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-20 20:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-11 8:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] workqueue: Introduce low-level unbound wq sysfs cpumask v3 Lai Jiangshan
2014-07-11 13:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140521191850.GD5259@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bitbucket@online.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox