From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753228AbaEUTSz (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 15:18:55 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f45.google.com ([209.85.192.45]:57928 "EHLO mail-qg0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753173AbaEUTSx (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 15:18:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:18:50 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Lai Jiangshan Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , LKML , Christoph Lameter , Kevin Hilman , Mike Galbraith , "Paul E. McKenney" , Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] workqueue: Allow changing attributions of ordered workqueues Message-ID: <20140521191850.GD5259@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1400257015-28222-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1400257015-28222-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <537C55C4.70706@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <537C55C4.70706@cn.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey, On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:29:08PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > Should we reorder the pwq_adjust_max_active() to avoid this declare? > (Move pwq_adjust_max_active() to the place just before rcu_free_pwq()) Yeah, sure. Sounds good to me. Thanks. -- tejun