From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
arm@kernel.org, Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 #2
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 23:42:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140521214255.GL3582@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140521211105.GD24341@quad.lixom.net>
Hi,
On 21/05/2014 at 14:11:05 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote :
> > This directory is flat, the board names are chosen by companies and
> > people that we do not control, a user tend to like finding his preferred
> > board dtb file unchanged from a kernel revision to another...
> > Well all this lead me to think that we don't have to loose too much time
> > thinking about a new strict convention for this file naming or changing
> > all this once again just for the sake of it.
> >
> > Other SoC maintainers beautifully designed from the beginning the naming
> > scheme of their DT files, fine. AT91 did not and forgive me but when
> > opening arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile file and seeing some file names, I'm
> > not ashamed. Moreover, now that I said to everybody since 3.10 to prefix
> > their *board* name with "at91-", I have to say something else, I don't
> > think it is worth it.
>
> I don't agree with everything above, but it's not worth arguing for the
> sake of arguing. :) I think we can tweak what you're doing now and get
> things to work well by merging new dts files with at91-<soc>-board.dts
> as the name. As mentioned, don't worry about the existing files. This
> shouldn't be a significiant change to what you've been telling people
> since 3.10 to cause much confusion.
>
I'm not sure we should keep the at91 prefix. The sama5d3 series is not
at91.
I would suggest using <soc>-<vendor>-<board> in the future, like what is
done for mvebu, berlin and some omap3 and freescale boards. I would
however make an exception for the evaluation kits and keep the current
"<soc>ek" name (else we would get sama5d3-atmel-sama5d3ek).
I also got confused by the at91- prefix when looking for a few dts files
but I think it is too late to rename now or maybe we could do it all at
once for a long term release (provided we know which one it will be).
For reference, the list of files that would need renaming:
animeo_ip.dts
at91-ariag25.dts
at91-cosino.dtsi
at91-cosino_mega2560.dts
at91-foxg20.dts
at91-qil_a9260.dts
ethernut5.dts
ge863-pro3.dtsi
kizbox.dts
mpa1600.dts
pm9g45.dts
tny_a9260.dts
tny_a9263.dts
tny_a9g20.dts
usb_a9260.dts
usb_a9263.dts
usb_a9g20_common.dtsi
aks-cdu.dts
evk-pro3.dts
at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-21 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-14 9:19 [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 #2 Nicolas Ferre
2014-05-20 5:50 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-20 15:19 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-05-20 16:47 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-21 10:17 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-05-21 21:11 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-21 21:39 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-21 21:42 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2014-05-21 21:51 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-22 8:48 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-05-20 17:13 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140521214255.GL3582@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=wenyou.yang@atmel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox