From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753853AbaEUWLx (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 18:11:53 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:38328 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753376AbaEUWLt (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 18:11:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 00:11:21 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , Jiri Kosina , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Andi Kleen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar , "Luck, Tony" Subject: Re: [RFC] x86_64: A real proposal for iret-less return to kernel Message-ID: <20140521221121.GL25130@pd.tnic> References: <20140521163315.GJ21205@pd.tnic> <20140521214319.GF25130@pd.tnic> <537D1E8B.1010505@zytor.com> <20140521215411.GI25130@pd.tnic> <537D21F2.8030702@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <537D21F2.8030702@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:00:18PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > So this is not a problem then. Yeah, f'get it - it is all good at that front. :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --