From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Jet Chen <jet.chen@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org
Subject: Re: [x86, vdso] cfda7bb9ecb: +14.7% will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 09:54:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140522015448.GA23196@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVFbo1yb7FyCH1Y=pHb89VPt9ycx0C-wv2A7h=CzwwdGA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Andy,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:46:58PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Jet Chen <jet.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/vdso
> > commit cfda7bb9ecbf9d96264bb5bade33a842966d1062 ("x86, vdso: Move syscall
> > and sysenter setup into kernel/cpu/common.c")
>
> This is really strange. That change shouldn't have any effect except
> that some kernels might boot a cycle or two faster.
>
> >
> > test case: nhm4/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> >
> > 3d7ee969bffcc98 cfda7bb9ecbf9d96264bb5bad
> > --------------- -------------------------
> > 5497021 ~ 0% +14.7% 6303424 ~ 0% TOTAL
> > will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
> > 0.54 ~ 0% +5.6% 0.57 ~ 0% TOTAL will-it-scale.scalability
> > 6209483 ~ 0% +1.6% 6305917 ~ 0% TOTAL
> > will-it-scale.per_process_ops
> > 2455 ~ 5% +16.9% 2870 ~ 5% TOTAL cpuidle.C1-NHM.usage
> > 8829 ~ 7% +15.2% 10169 ~10% TOTAL
> > slabinfo.kmalloc-64.active_objs
> > 24.13 ~12% +48.9% 35.93 ~14% TOTAL time.user_time
> > 393 ~ 0% -3.0% 382 ~ 1% TOTAL time.system_time
> >
>
> Is this a speedup or a slowdown?
It's a speedup. The will-it-scale/sched_yield test case's throughput
increased by +14.7% (multi-thread case) and +1.6% (multi-process case).
However the CPU %user time increased more, by +48.9%.
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-22 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-20 5:59 [x86, vdso] cfda7bb9ecb: +14.7% will-it-scale.per_thread_ops Jet Chen
2014-05-21 22:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-22 1:54 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2014-05-22 5:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140522015448.GA23196@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jet.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox