From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
Larry Bassel <larry.bassel@linaro.org>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: enable context tracking
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 17:12:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140523161219.GK21319@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140523155544.GA24994@leverpostej>
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:55:44PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:51:07PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 01:11:38AM +0100, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > I haven't checked all the code paths but at least for pushing onto the
> > stack we must keep it 16-bytes aligned (architecture requirement).
>
> Sure -- if modifying the stack we need to push/pop pairs of registers to
> keep it aligned. It might be better to use xzr as the dummy value in
> that case to make it clear that the value doesn't really matter.
>
> That said, ct_user_enter is only called in kernel_exit before we restore
> the values off the stack, and the only register I can spot that we need
> to preserve is x0 for the syscall return value. I can't see x1 or x2
> being used any more specially than the rest of the remaining registers.
> Am I missing something, or would it be sufficient to do the following?
>
> push x0, xzr
> bl context_tacking_user_enter
> pop x0, xzr
... and if that works, then why are we using the stack instead of a
callee-saved register?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-23 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-22 19:27 [PATCH v4 0/2] context tracker support for arm64 Larry Bassel
2014-05-22 19:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: adjust el0_sync so that a function can be called Larry Bassel
2014-05-22 20:23 ` Christopher Covington
2014-05-22 22:35 ` Larry Bassel
2014-05-23 14:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-23 17:04 ` Larry Bassel
2014-05-22 19:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: enable context tracking Larry Bassel
2014-05-22 20:29 ` Christopher Covington
2014-05-23 0:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-05-23 14:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-23 15:55 ` Mark Rutland
2014-05-23 16:12 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-05-24 0:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-05-22 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] context tracker support for arm64 Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140523161219.GK21319@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=larry.bassel@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox