From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751188AbaEWVzt (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2014 17:55:49 -0400 Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9]:57500 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750995AbaEWVzs (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2014 17:55:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 23:55:44 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Olof Johansson , arm@kernel.org, Linux Kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , Boris BREZILLON , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Ludovic Desroches Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3 Message-ID: <20140523215544.GI13642@piout.net> References: <1400775895-31183-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> <201405232327.52312.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201405232327.52312.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/05/2014 at 23:27:51 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote : > On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more > > SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request > > but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration > > option). > > Four done, four more to go? Nice progress! > I'm on it ;) I actually have two more almost ready but I will submit the remaining four for 3.17. I don't think this is urgent enough to rush it and I'd like to test it enough before we start removing the old clock implementation and board files. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com