public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Staging: Silicom: Bypasslib: Fixed a couple of checkpatch.pl warnings
@ 2014-05-23 21:39 Chaitanya Hazarey
  2014-05-23 22:25 ` Greg KH
  2014-05-23 22:54 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chaitanya Hazarey @ 2014-05-23 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh, christoph.kohl, michael.hoefler, rupert; +Cc: linux-kernel, devel, c

Added a blank line after declarations to fix the following warnings issued by checkpatch.pl:

drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c:138: WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c:189: WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations

Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Hazarey <c@24.io>
---
 drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c b/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
index a58251f..8e714a8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static int doit(int cmd, int if_index, int *data)
 static int is_dev_sd(int if_index)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
+
 	SET_BPLIB_INT_FN(is_bypass, int, if_index, ret);
 	return ret >= 0 ? 1 : 0;
 }
@@ -186,6 +187,7 @@ static int is_bypass_dev(int if_index)
 static int is_bypass(int if_index)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
+
 	SET_BPLIB_INT_FN(is_bypass, int, if_index, ret);
 	if (ret < 0)
--
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Staging: Silicom: Bypasslib: Fixed a couple of checkpatch.pl warnings
  2014-05-23 21:39 [PATCH] Staging: Silicom: Bypasslib: Fixed a couple of checkpatch.pl warnings Chaitanya Hazarey
@ 2014-05-23 22:25 ` Greg KH
  2014-05-23 22:54 ` Dan Carpenter
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2014-05-23 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chaitanya Hazarey
  Cc: christoph.kohl, michael.hoefler, rupert, devel, linux-kernel

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:39:43PM -0700, Chaitanya Hazarey wrote:
> Added a blank line after declarations to fix the following warnings issued by checkpatch.pl:
> 
> drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c:138: WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c:189: WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Hazarey <c@24.io>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

This patch doesn't apply cleanly.  Can you please refresh it against my
staging-next branch of staging.git on git.kernel.org and resend?

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Staging: Silicom: Bypasslib: Fixed a couple of checkpatch.pl warnings
  2014-05-23 21:39 [PATCH] Staging: Silicom: Bypasslib: Fixed a couple of checkpatch.pl warnings Chaitanya Hazarey
  2014-05-23 22:25 ` Greg KH
@ 2014-05-23 22:54 ` Dan Carpenter
  2014-05-24  5:31   ` Chaitanya Hazarey
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2014-05-23 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chaitanya Hazarey
  Cc: gregkh, christoph.kohl, michael.hoefler, rupert, devel,
	linux-kernel

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:39:43PM -0700, Chaitanya Hazarey wrote:
> Added a blank line after declarations to fix the following warnings issued by checkpatch.pl:
> 
> drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c:138: WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c:189: WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Hazarey <c@24.io>

Still doesn't apply, I'm afraid.

> ---
>  drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c b/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
> index a58251f..8e714a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
> @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static int doit(int cmd, int if_index, int *data)
>  static int is_dev_sd(int if_index)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
> +
>  	SET_BPLIB_INT_FN(is_bypass, int, if_index, ret);
>  	return ret >= 0 ? 1 : 0;
>  }
> @@ -186,6 +187,7 @@ static int is_bypass_dev(int if_index)
>  static int is_bypass(int if_index)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
> +
>  	SET_BPLIB_INT_FN(is_bypass, int, if_index, ret);
>  	if (ret < 0)

There was supposed to be a blank line between the call to
SET_BPLIB_INT_FN() and the return check and it got deleted for some
reason.

regards,
dan carpetner



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Staging: Silicom: Bypasslib: Fixed a couple of checkpatch.pl warnings
  2014-05-23 22:54 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2014-05-24  5:31   ` Chaitanya Hazarey
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chaitanya Hazarey @ 2014-05-24  5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, christoph.kohl, michael.hoefler, rupert,
	devel, linux-kernel

Hey Dan,

Thanks for your patience, I have resubmitted via a new email. Hope that works.

Thanks,

Chaitanya

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:39:43PM -0700, Chaitanya Hazarey wrote:
>> Added a blank line after declarations to fix the following warnings issued by checkpatch.pl:
>>
>> drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c:138: WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
>> drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c:189: WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Hazarey <c@24.io>
>
> Still doesn't apply, I'm afraid.
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c |    2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c b/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
>> index a58251f..8e714a8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/silicom/bypasslib/bypass.c
>> @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static int doit(int cmd, int if_index, int *data)
>>  static int is_dev_sd(int if_index)
>>  {
>>       int ret = 0;
>> +
>>       SET_BPLIB_INT_FN(is_bypass, int, if_index, ret);
>>       return ret >= 0 ? 1 : 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -186,6 +187,7 @@ static int is_bypass_dev(int if_index)
>>  static int is_bypass(int if_index)
>>  {
>>       int ret = 0;
>> +
>>       SET_BPLIB_INT_FN(is_bypass, int, if_index, ret);
>>       if (ret < 0)
>
> There was supposed to be a blank line between the call to
> SET_BPLIB_INT_FN() and the return check and it got deleted for some
> reason.
>
> regards,
> dan carpetner
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-24  5:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-23 21:39 [PATCH] Staging: Silicom: Bypasslib: Fixed a couple of checkpatch.pl warnings Chaitanya Hazarey
2014-05-23 22:25 ` Greg KH
2014-05-23 22:54 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-24  5:31   ` Chaitanya Hazarey

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox