From: Vasily Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
To: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] /proc/pid/status: show all sets of pid according to ns
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 22:04:43 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140526180443.GA11145@cachalot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401098728-2001-1-git-send-email-chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hi Chen,
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 18:05 +0800, Chen Hanxiao wrote:
> We need a direct method of getting the pid inside containers.
> If some issues occurred inside a container guest, host user
> could not know which process is in trouble just by guest pid:
> the users of container guest only knew the pid inside containers.
> This will bring obstacle for trouble shooting.
>
> This patch expands fields of Tgid and Pid:
> a) In init_pid_ns, nothing changed;
>
> b) In one pidns, they will tell the pid inside containers:
> Tgid: 1628 9 3
> Pid: 1628 9 3
> ** process id is 1628 in level 0, 9 in level 1, 3 in level 2.
1. It breaks ABI. Any application which does something like "grep pid: | cut -d: -f2"
is now broken by the patch. Maybe add a new field like 'Pid-ns', 'PidNS',
or 'Pids' and leave the old one for compatibility?
2. Is it OK to show internal pids to unprivileged processes? I cannot
see anything obviously dangerous with it, though.
> c) If pidns is nested, it depends on which pidns are you in.
> Tgid: 9 3
> Pid: 9 3
> ** Views from level 1 for Pid 1628 in host.
--
Vasily
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-26 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-26 10:05 [PATCH] /proc/pid/status: show all sets of pid according to ns Chen Hanxiao
2014-05-26 11:09 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-05-27 9:36 ` chenhanxiao
2014-05-26 18:04 ` Vasily Kulikov [this message]
2014-05-27 10:01 ` chenhanxiao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140526180443.GA11145@cachalot \
--to=segooon@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox