From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751666AbaEZT0P (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2014 15:26:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:58061 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751343AbaEZT0O (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2014 15:26:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 21:26:10 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Kevin Hilman , "Paul E. McKenney" , Thomas Gleixner , Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] irq_work: Implement remote queueing Message-ID: <20140526192608.GI2066@localhost.localdomain> References: <1401028191-29756-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1401028191-29756-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20140526160224.GM30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140526165039.GE2066@localhost.localdomain> <20140526191918.GA5444@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140526191918.GA5444@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:19:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 06:50:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 04:29:49PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > +bool irq_work_queue_on(struct irq_work *work, int cpu) > > > > +{ > > > > + /* Only queue if not already pending */ > > > > + if (!irq_work_claim(work)) > > > > + return false; > > > > + > > > > + /* All work should have been flushed before going offline */ > > > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(cpu)); > > > WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()); > > > > But it's actually NMI safe, isn't it? > > Deja-vu: > > lkml.kernel.org/r/20140514115406.GA11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Doh!