linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: blk-mq: refactor request allocation
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 07:19:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140528051919.GA21566@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5384FC60.1070103@fb.com>

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 02:58:08PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 12:59 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This series streamlines the request allocation path.
> > 
> 
> Series looks innocuous enough to me, but it's about a 1.5% performance
> drop here with an actual device. These tests are very stable, anything
> over ~0.1% is definitely outside of noise. I repeated and rebooted a few
> times and tested both, it's persistent. No smoking guns in the profile.

Can you do a bisect to narrow it down to one of the patches?

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-28  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-27 18:59 blk-mq: refactor request allocation Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: merge blk_mq_alloc_reserved_request into blk_mq_alloc_request Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] blk-mq: initialize request in __blk_mq_alloc_request Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] blk-mq: remove blk_mq_wait_for_tags Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] blk-mq: do not use blk_mq_alloc_request_pinned in blk_mq_map_request Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-27 18:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: remove blk_mq_alloc_request_pinned Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-27 20:58 ` blk-mq: refactor request allocation Jens Axboe
2014-05-28  5:19   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-05-28 14:20     ` Jens Axboe
2014-05-28 15:47     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140528051919.GA21566@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).