From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: DaeSeok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
Cc: devel <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
Lidza Louina <lidza.louina@gmail.com>,
driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mark Hounschell <markh@compro.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] staging: dgap: implement proper error handling in dgap_firmware_load()
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 13:11:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140528101153.GU15585@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHb8M2ABVCaoNR0m5mLmWv-ei60PDRu462QTqDgEJwAf63oteg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:29:38PM +0900, DaeSeok Youn wrote:
> > In your patch it has:
> > + dgap_tty_uninit(brd, false);
> >
> > But it should only be "false" if dgap_tty_init() failed. If
> > dgap_tty_register_ports() fails then it should be "true". Another
> Yes, you're right. There were no error handle for tty_port_register_device() and
> dgap_create_tty_sysfs() in dgap_tty_register_ports(). I didn't catch it. :-(
> It need to add error handlers for them, right?
Eventually, yes. But I don't see a simple way to fix
dgap_firmware_load() until after the code is cleaned up.
>
> > problem is that as you say, the earlier function are allocating
> > resources like dgap_tty_register() but only the last two function calls
> > have a "goto err_cleanup;" so the error handling is incomplete.
> So remove "goto" in dgap_firmware_load() and add error handler in
> dgap_tty_init()
In the current code there isn't a goto in dgap_firmware_load(). Remove
the call to dgap_tty_uninit() and add error handling in dgap_tty_init().
That will clean up the code, and fix some NULL dereference bugs inside
dgap_tty_uninit().
> and dgap_tty_register_ports(), right?
Inside dgap_tty_register_ports(), then we should add a
kfree(brd->serial_ports) if the "brd->printer_ports" allocation fails.
That is not a complete fix, but it is a part fix and it is clean.
>
> I have a question of this. In case of this, how to complete the error handling?
[patch 1/x] staging: dgap: remove useless dgap_probe1() function
[patch 2/x] staging: dgap: unwind on error in dgap_found_board()
[patch 3/x] staging: dgap: remove bogus null test in dgap_tty_init()
The ->channels[] were set to null in dgap_found_board().
[patch 4/x] staging: dgap: unwind on error in dgap_tty_init()
This also removes the call to dgap_tty_uninit() in
dgap_firmware_load()
[patch 5/x] staging: dgap: unwind on error in dgap_tty_register_ports()
[patch 6/x] staging: dgap: make dgap_config_buf a local buffer
[patch 7/x] staging: dgap: pass "dgap_numboards" to dgap_found_board()
instead of using a global variable
[patch 8/x] staging: dgap: pass "brd" to dgap_after_config_loaded()
instead of passing "dgap_numboards" and looking up brd again.
[patch 9/x] staging: dgap: rename dgap_finalize_board_init() to dgap_request_irq()
In the end, I hate dgap_tty_uninit() because it doesn't match
dgap_tty_init() at all. It's poorly named. We should rename it and
make another dgap_tty_init() which just sets the ->channels[] to NULL.
[patch x/x] staging: dgap: introduce dgap_tty_unregister()
This is currently done in dgap_tty_uninit(), which is the wrong
place.
I have started using a new todo list tag in my emails. So I'm adding
this stuff to the todo list.
TODO-list: 2014-05-28: dgap: cleanups and bug fixes.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-27 7:09 [PATCH V2] staging: dgap: implement proper error handling in dgap_firmware_load() Daeseok Youn
2014-05-27 10:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-27 23:36 ` DaeSeok Youn
2014-05-28 7:02 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-28 9:29 ` DaeSeok Youn
2014-05-28 10:11 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2014-05-29 0:17 ` DaeSeok Youn
2014-05-29 6:40 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-29 20:59 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <1203682594.1176349.1401271946432.JavaMail.root@mx2.compro.net>
2014-05-28 14:14 ` Mark Hounschell
2014-05-28 14:26 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140528101153.GU15585@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=daeseok.youn@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lidza.louina@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markh@compro.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox