From: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
To: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
jet.chen@intel.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [jet.chen@intel.com: [bio] kernel BUG at drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:166!]
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 17:09:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140528150924.GA5301@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140527112459.GF2205@dhcp-27-189.brq.redhat.com>
Hi,
On 27.05.2014 13:24, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:43:59AM +0200, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
> >
> > But now I'm suspicious of this part of commit 3979ef4dcf:
> >
> > failed:
> > bvec->bv_page = NULL;
> > bvec->bv_len = 0;
> > bvec->bv_offset = 0;
> > bio->bi_vcnt--; <----------------
> > blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
> > return 0;
> >
> > Is decreasing bi_vcnt sufficient to guarantee that blk_recount_segments()
> > recalculates the correct number of physical segments?
> > Looking at the __blk_recalc_rq_segments() it appears it may not be the case.
> >
> > The question is how can we restore the correct number of physical segments in case
> > of failure without breaking anything...
>
> If my hypothesis is correct, the following patch should trigger a kernel panic,
> Jet Chen, can you try it and let me know whether the BUG_ON is hit or not?
I was also able to reproduce this bug just as reported by Jet Chen,
and now I think I've found out a solution. I'll send out a patch.
Regards,
Dongsu
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 0443694..763868f 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -701,6 +701,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
> unsigned int max_sectors)
> {
> int retried_segments = 0;
> + unsigned int phys_segments_orig;
> struct bio_vec *bvec;
>
> /*
> @@ -751,6 +752,9 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
> if (bio->bi_vcnt >= bio->bi_max_vecs)
> return 0;
>
> + blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
> + phys_segments_orig = bio->bi_phys_segments;
> +
> /*
> * setup the new entry, we might clear it again later if we
> * cannot add the page
> @@ -811,6 +815,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
> bvec->bv_offset = 0;
> bio->bi_vcnt--;
> blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
> + BUG_ON(phys_segments_orig != bio->bi_phys_segments);
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> Regards,
> Maurizio Lombardi
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-26 19:43 [jet.chen@intel.com: [bio] kernel BUG at drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:166!] Maurizio Lombardi
2014-05-27 4:03 ` Ming Lei
2014-05-27 8:44 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2014-05-27 11:24 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2014-05-28 15:09 ` Dongsu Park [this message]
2014-05-28 15:09 ` [PATCH] bio: decrease bi_iter.bi_size by len in the fail path Dongsu Park
2014-05-28 15:42 ` Ming Lei
2014-05-28 16:59 ` Ming Lei
2014-05-28 17:21 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2014-05-28 17:44 ` Ming Lei
2014-05-29 6:06 ` Jet Chen
2014-05-29 7:04 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2014-05-29 7:28 ` Ming Lei
2014-05-29 3:35 ` Jet Chen
2014-05-29 4:13 ` Ming Lei
2014-05-29 4:36 ` Jet Chen
2014-05-30 9:41 ` Dongsu Park
2014-05-28 15:49 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2014-05-29 3:21 ` Jet Chen
2014-05-28 15:16 ` [jet.chen@intel.com: [bio] kernel BUG at drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:166!] Jet Chen
2014-05-28 15:27 ` Maurizio Lombardi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140528150924.GA5301@gmail.com \
--to=dongsu.park@profitbricks.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jet.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox