public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
To: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	jet.chen@intel.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp@01.org, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [jet.chen@intel.com: [bio] kernel BUG at drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:166!]
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 17:09:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140528150924.GA5301@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140527112459.GF2205@dhcp-27-189.brq.redhat.com>

Hi,

On 27.05.2014 13:24, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:43:59AM +0200, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
> > 
> > But now I'm suspicious of this part of commit 3979ef4dcf:
> > 
> >  failed:
> >         bvec->bv_page = NULL;
> >         bvec->bv_len = 0;
> >         bvec->bv_offset = 0;
> >         bio->bi_vcnt--;  <----------------
> >         blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
> >         return 0;
> > 
> > Is decreasing bi_vcnt sufficient to guarantee that blk_recount_segments()
> > recalculates the correct number of physical segments?
> > Looking at the __blk_recalc_rq_segments() it appears it may not be the case.
> > 
> > The question is how can we restore the correct number of physical segments in case
> > of failure without breaking anything...
> 
> If my hypothesis is correct, the following patch should trigger a kernel panic,
> Jet Chen, can you try it and let me know whether the BUG_ON is hit or not?

I was also able to reproduce this bug just as reported by Jet Chen,
and now I think I've found out a solution. I'll send out a patch.

Regards,
Dongsu

> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 0443694..763868f 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -701,6 +701,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
>  			  unsigned int max_sectors)
>  {
>  	int retried_segments = 0;
> +	unsigned int phys_segments_orig;
>  	struct bio_vec *bvec;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -751,6 +752,9 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
>  	if (bio->bi_vcnt >= bio->bi_max_vecs)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
> +	phys_segments_orig = bio->bi_phys_segments;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * setup the new entry, we might clear it again later if we
>  	 * cannot add the page
> @@ -811,6 +815,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
>  	bvec->bv_offset = 0;
>  	bio->bi_vcnt--;
>  	blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
> +	BUG_ON(phys_segments_orig != bio->bi_phys_segments);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Maurizio Lombardi 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-28 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-26 19:43 [jet.chen@intel.com: [bio] kernel BUG at drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:166!] Maurizio Lombardi
2014-05-27  4:03 ` Ming Lei
2014-05-27  8:44   ` Maurizio Lombardi
2014-05-27 11:24     ` Maurizio Lombardi
2014-05-28 15:09       ` Dongsu Park [this message]
2014-05-28 15:09       ` [PATCH] bio: decrease bi_iter.bi_size by len in the fail path Dongsu Park
2014-05-28 15:42         ` Ming Lei
2014-05-28 16:59           ` Ming Lei
2014-05-28 17:21             ` Maurizio Lombardi
2014-05-28 17:44               ` Ming Lei
2014-05-29  6:06                 ` Jet Chen
2014-05-29  7:04                   ` Maurizio Lombardi
2014-05-29  7:28                     ` Ming Lei
2014-05-29  3:35             ` Jet Chen
2014-05-29  4:13               ` Ming Lei
2014-05-29  4:36                 ` Jet Chen
2014-05-30  9:41             ` Dongsu Park
2014-05-28 15:49         ` Maurizio Lombardi
2014-05-29  3:21         ` Jet Chen
2014-05-28 15:16       ` [jet.chen@intel.com: [bio] kernel BUG at drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:166!] Jet Chen
2014-05-28 15:27         ` Maurizio Lombardi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140528150924.GA5301@gmail.com \
    --to=dongsu.park@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jet.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox