From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753144AbaE1RiQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 13:38:16 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:45769 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751550AbaE1RiP (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 13:38:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 18:37:55 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Viresh Kumar , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arvind.chauhan@arm.com, edubezval@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz, lgirdwood@gmail.com Message-ID: <20140528173755.GF5099@sirena.org.uk> References: <1780c3205893be8567fa29ccd86674e2f32555b4.1401192160.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20140527192923.GC12304@sirena.org.uk> <233568355.QJI3TVGr1I@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hUH5gZbnpyIv7Mn4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <233568355.QJI3TVGr1I@vostro.rjw.lan> X-Cookie: Ditat Deus. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --hUH5gZbnpyIv7Mn4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:12:57AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 08:29:23 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 05:37:29PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > Liam/Broonie: Please see if this can go through Rafael as 2nd patch is dependent > > > on it. > > Is that likely to happen before the merge window? > Depending. If there's -rc8, then maybe. Otherwise, nope. The reason I was asking was that I'm happy to just go ahead and apply the patch right now if you're likely to not apply the second patch until after the merge window. Let's just do that for now, if you decide you will apply then please add my ack and let me know so I can drop the duplicate. --hUH5gZbnpyIv7Mn4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJThh7wAAoJELSic+t+oim9tJEP/1FknClrkL3Rskx0DVOBA+mq 3HQ8Fpsv8sNjZ8eVhTi+6ajaoVIDLp27zRYxMAUlF64OdlPzTdjKmj/rOR9crsQq bCjkLDFzxeBFA+xC6VMFX6ipumEy8qelCpKV8W4FiSy8kVNzyGVMxEZ3GT/MCBC8 /g5LqvHXlv7EK7Aens+/GUCqm+HEcS/Hbh/XktlfLUNIlP6khJ9rrTeYVqeBirBe PLCHuv4q3an7rm0Yz2HV8ACl1ICWEjQVFvd13HgWe9nUUfsFJDbT+9gdJhTvYGIU dpsbc7qDrmNtl8WXJq9p8pBFwMlKbQ7wwJdsZd0j6896CL9ODMk19fsxGsPVbvDv ZvYOm+eTifmVfPtAQZl/MRIYWTh/1/od/UYMvCeH2v/meQYuu1HjZPMC8pbjJdON dXC+2qbwDq2udN5ghRP1PXjC96sKyYkUa+FxwXepwDGcDSHbewA5scROysqzygTT FeIfKemEuqZaHCKBNlGyKw4s7XdIs2nK8L1gqJyAzweXopNbgkd/U0VZOM9x7xPq l642KzC7Ec0Ls0umqiGlY4mGA7oWxgJrFa0txiDG/kTncZosuueBuGbCadvW3/cf HzXH/Au24NfuOX6fdGZeuxiwfbEk9mbNpw2iTnPEpIVCC8lnGB2J5HU+s3RVWuiW rFQiDfWlohbaDcxUBRJt =durA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hUH5gZbnpyIv7Mn4--