From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752828AbaE1Rzn (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 13:55:43 -0400 Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9]:46557 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751158AbaE1Rzl (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 13:55:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:55:35 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Paul Bolle Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Ferre , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: atmel_pwm: only build for supported platforms Message-ID: <20140528175439.GA18470@piout.net> References: <1399560433-1402630-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1399560990-1402858-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1399560990-1402858-17-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <536CA80A.60201@atmel.com> <1401279867.22486.6.camel@x220> <20140528155916.GA9793@piout.net> <1401293383.22486.18.camel@x220> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1401293383.22486.18.camel@x220> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28/05/2014 at 18:09:43 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote : > On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 17:59 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 28/05/2014 at 14:24:27 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote : > > > > > config ATMEL_PWM > > > > > tristate "Atmel AT32/AT91 PWM support" > > > > > - depends on HAVE_CLK && (AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST) > > > > > + depends on HAVE_CLK > > > > > + depends on AVR32 || AT91SAM9263 || AT91SAM9RL || AT91SAM9G45 > > > > > > Symbols AT91SAM9263, AT91SAM9RL, and AT91SAM9G45 do not seem to exist in > > > next-20140528. Should these perhaps be SOC_AT91SAM9263, SOC_AT91SAM9RL, > > > and SOC_AT91SAM9G45 and/or ARCH_AT91SAM9263, ARCH_AT91SAM9RL, and > > > ARCH_AT91SAM9G45? > > > > I wouldn't bother too much fixing that, this will definitely be remove > > in 3.17. > > Are you talking about: 1) the problem this patch tried to fix; or 2) the > problem it created? > I'm removing the whole atmel_pwm driver so the CONFIG_ATMEL_PWM symbol will be gone. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com