From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755748AbaE2C5R (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 22:57:17 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:11096 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755447AbaE2C5Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 22:57:16 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,932,1392192000"; d="scan'208";a="438356473" Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:56:55 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Dave Hansen Cc: Stephane Eranian , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , "mingo@elte.hu" , "Yan, Zheng" Subject: Re: [RFC] perf/x86: PMU IRQ handler issues Message-ID: <20140529025655.GA8876@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <53864517.3040503@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53864517.3040503@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > actual numbers describing the issues that you're seeing, including the > ftrace that Andi was asking for? There are also some handy tracepoints > for NMI lengths that I stuck in. Another good thing would be to plot the periods (from perf report -D) -Andi