From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: "Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] export efi.flags to sysfs
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 08:59:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140529125910.GE14570@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL01qpsb5_Gh31uqm7yB6HP2rKQkhFWWTu+U4JAR54XR5bfbZw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:53:19PM +0100, Fleming, Matt wrote:
> On 28 May 2014 15:51, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:09:35AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > [..]
> >> > I've only vaguely been following along with the other thread, so please
> >> > summarise everything again in your patch. Particularly, I need answers
> >> > to the following questions,
> >> >
> >> > - Are you trying to fix a kexec/kdump regression?
> >>
> >> Somehow it is a regression.
> >
> > Well, it is a *regression*. Previously kdump would work with
> > SGI UV machines as it used "noefi". Now kexec by default thinks that
> > efi is enabled and 1:1 mappings are in place and that does not work
> > with SGI UV machines.
>
> So, if someone boots an SGI UV machine with the "noefi" kernel command
> line parameter, the kernel still creates
> /sys/firmware/efi/runtime-map/ ? Why does kexec/kdump think a kernel
> booted with "noefi" supports EFI?
>
> Or are we talking about a different "noefi" parameter?
Only second kernel boots with "noefi" and this parameter is appened by
kexec-tools to second kernel command line. So first kernel will still
boot *without noefi* and kexec-tools wil think that this system support
booting second kernel with UEFI enabled.
I don't know if we export /sys/firmware/efi/runtime-map/ in case of
non 1:1 mapping or not. Dave and Boris will know better.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-29 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-26 8:39 [PATCH] export efi.flags to sysfs Dave Young
2014-05-27 3:00 ` Dave Young
2014-05-27 13:36 ` Fleming, Matt
2014-05-28 2:09 ` Dave Young
2014-05-28 9:47 ` Dave Young
2014-05-28 15:51 ` Alex Thorlton
2014-05-28 19:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-05-28 20:11 ` Alex Thorlton
2014-05-29 11:58 ` Fleming, Matt
2014-05-29 2:37 ` Dave Young
2014-05-28 14:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-05-29 11:53 ` Fleming, Matt
2014-05-29 12:59 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2014-05-29 13:10 ` Fleming, Matt
2014-05-30 1:53 ` Dave Young
2014-05-27 13:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-05-28 2:13 ` Dave Young
2014-05-28 12:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-05-29 2:08 ` Dave Young
2014-05-29 9:09 ` Dave Young
2014-05-29 12:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-05-29 12:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-30 2:24 ` Dave Young
2014-05-30 7:33 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140529125910.GE14570@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).