From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932604AbaE3IKx (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 04:10:53 -0400 Received: from hqemgate14.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.143]:4239 "EHLO hqemgate14.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932487AbaE3IKr (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 04:10:47 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp07.nvidia.com on Fri, 30 May 2014 01:03:35 -0700 Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 11:10:43 +0300 From: Peter De Schrijver To: Saravana Kannan CC: Mike Turquette , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] clk: flatten clk tree in debugfs Message-ID: <20140530081043.GO5961@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> References: <1400842772-4862-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <537FCAA0.6080106@codeaurora.org> <20140526111453.GE5961@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> <53862142.8080006@codeaurora.org> <20140528185210.10062.16299@quantum> <538656C1.3090402@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <538656C1.3090402@codeaurora.org> X-NVConfidentiality: public User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >> > >> Mike, others, > >> > >> Any objections to this idea? If there's not much opposition, then maybe > >> Peter can actually spend time fixing and testing this patch? > > > > Idea seems fine. I had actually considered removing the hiearchal > > directory structure completely with the advent of clk_dump and > > clk_summary, but if there is value in the flattened directory structure > > then I'm all for it. > I think the additional value of the flattened directory probably comes > from internal tree patches that would add set rate capability to clocks, > etc that would be helpful with testing. > Yes. Eg. I posted a patch to dump a clocks registers for Tegra. > Agree with all the comments so far. > > Peter, > > Looks like there's some support and no opposition so far. So do you want > to send out a real patch that's been tested and with the comments above > taken care of? Yes. I will do that. Cheers, Peter.