From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755485AbaE3Jmq (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 05:42:46 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:33411 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755160AbaE3Jmp (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 05:42:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 10:42:43 +0100 From: Charles Keepax To: Chanwoo Choi Cc: myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] extcon: arizona: Update manual headphone detection calculation Message-ID: <20140530094243.GB11951@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1401377274-10249-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1401377274-10249-3-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <5387DE87.5090009@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5387DE87.5090009@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:27:35AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Hi Charles, > > On 05/30/2014 12:27 AM, Charles Keepax wrote: > > The higher levels of impedance have a higher minimum value than the > > first level. As the same value was used for all levels, higher impedances > > were reported with a very low level of accuracy. This patch applies the > > approriate lower threshold for each level. > > > > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax > > --- > > drivers/extcon/extcon-arizona.c | 13 ++++++++----- > > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-arizona.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-arizona.c > > index f2c36b1..c1c8647 100644 > > --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-arizona.c > > +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-arizona.c > > @@ -329,12 +329,13 @@ static void arizona_stop_mic(struct arizona_extcon_info *info) > > } > > > > static struct { > > + unsigned int threshold; > > unsigned int factor_a; > > unsigned int factor_b; > > } arizona_hpdet_b_ranges[] = { > > - { 5528, 362464 }, > > - { 11084, 6186851 }, > > - { 11065, 65460395 }, > > + { 100, 5528, 362464 }, > > + { 169, 11084, 6186851 }, > > + { 169, 11065, 65460395 }, > > If you possible, I want to know the 'unit' of the variable(factor_a, factor_b). I am not sure there are really especially sensible units to give. > > > }; > > > > static struct { > > @@ -391,7 +392,8 @@ static int arizona_hpdet_read(struct arizona_extcon_info *info) > > >> ARIZONA_HP_IMPEDANCE_RANGE_SHIFT; > > > > if (range < ARRAY_SIZE(arizona_hpdet_b_ranges) - 1 && > > - (val < 100 || val >= 0x3fb)) { > > + (val < arizona_hpdet_b_ranges[range].threshold || > > + val >= 0x3fb)) { > > I don't understand the meaning of 0x3fb hex value. > I prefer to define constant variable for readability. Thats fine I can add a define as part of this patch. Thanks, Charles