From: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block/bio.c: update bi_iter.bi_size before recounting segments
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 11:42:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140530094247.GB5207@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401350380-31072-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>
Hi Ming,
On 29.05.2014 15:59, Ming Lei wrote:
> The patch of "bio: modify __bio_add_page() to accept pages that
> don't start a new segment" changes the way for adding one page
> to bio:
>
> - previously by adding page after checking successfully
> - now by trying to add page and recover if it fails
>
> Unfortunately the patch forgets to update bio->bi_iter.bi_size
> before trying to add page, then the last vector for holding
> the added page may not be covered if recouning segments is needed,
> so bio->bi_phys_segments may become not consistent with the
> actual bio page buffers after the page is added successfully
> to the bio(after bi_iter.bi_size is added by 'len')
>
> Suppose the page in the last vector can't be merged to bio, tragedy
> will happen when __bio_add_page() is called to add another page:
>
> - blk_recount_segments() is called and the actual segments get
> figured out correctly
>
> - the actual segments may become queue_max_segments(q) plus one
> in failure path
>
> - driver will find the segment count is too big to handle.
>
> The patch fixes the virtio-blk oops bug reported from Jet Chen in
> below link:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140113053817095&w=2
A great patch description, thanks! :-)
You can add:
Tested-by: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Reported-by: Jet Chen <jet.chen@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Jet Chen <jet.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> ---
> Andrew, could you put the patch in your -mm tree
> because the previous two patches were routed from
> your tree?
>
> block/bio.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 0443694..f9bae56 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -744,6 +744,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
> }
> }
>
> + bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
> goto done;
> }
> }
> @@ -761,6 +762,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
> bvec->bv_offset = offset;
> bio->bi_vcnt++;
> bio->bi_phys_segments++;
> + bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
>
> /*
> * Perform a recount if the number of segments is greater
> @@ -802,7 +804,6 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
> bio->bi_flags &= ~(1 << BIO_SEG_VALID);
>
> done:
> - bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
> return len;
>
> failed:
> @@ -810,6 +811,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
> bvec->bv_len = 0;
> bvec->bv_offset = 0;
> bio->bi_vcnt--;
> + bio->bi_iter.bi_size -= len;
> blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-30 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-29 7:59 [PATCH] block/bio.c: update bi_iter.bi_size before recounting segments Ming Lei
2014-05-30 9:42 ` Dongsu Park [this message]
2014-06-26 15:17 ` Maurizio Lombardi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140530094247.GB5207@gmail.com \
--to=dongsu.park@profitbricks.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox