From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756786AbaFAJzz (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2014 05:55:55 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:59621 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751346AbaFAJzx (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2014 05:55:53 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 10:55:46 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Hiroshi Doyu , Rob Herring , Thierry Reding , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Cho KyongHo , Grant Grundler , Dave P Martin , Marc Zyngier , Joerg Roedel , Stephen Warren , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Linux IOMMU , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] devicetree: Add generic IOMMU device tree bindings Message-ID: <20140601095546.GA8625@arm.com> References: <1400877218-4113-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <4545972.cM7IP1qTXQ@wuerfel> <87tx87rrp2.fsf@nvidia.com> <4462924.8iRbdkOPp7@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4462924.8iRbdkOPp7@wuerfel> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 08:54:37PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 30 May 2014 22:29:13 Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > Tegra,SMMU has a similar problem and we have used a fixed size bitmap(64 > > bit) to afford 64 stream IDs so that a single device can hold multiple > > IDs. If we apply the same bitmap to the above exmaple: > > > > iommu { > > /* the specifier represents the ID of the master */ > > #address-cells = <1>; > > #size-cells = <0>; > > }; > > > > master@a { > > ... > > iommus = <&smmu (BIT(1) | BIT(2) | BIT(3))>; # IDs 1 2 3 > > }; > > > > master@b { > > ... > > iommus = <&smmu BIT(4)>; # ID 4 > > }; > > > > The disadvantage of this is that this limits the max number of streamIDs > > to support. If # of streamID is increased later more than 64, this > > format cannot cover any more. You have to predict the max # of streamIDs > > in advance if steamID is statically assigned. > > > > Well, the iommu specific binding could allow a variable #address-cells. > That way, you just need to know the number of stream IDs for that instance > of the iommu. In general, though, the SMMU will be able to support a large number of stream IDs (say a 16-bit space). The restriction we're interested in here is how many different stream IDs can be emitted by a single master device coming into the SMMU. *That* is a property of the master, not the SMMU. In the current arm,smmu binding I have a #stream-id-cells property in each master. I can then feed that straight into of_parse_phandle_with_args to enumerate the IDs for that master. The problem with that is we're artificially restricted by MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS. Will