From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
jejb@parisc-linux.org, deller@gmx.de,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chegu_vinod@hp.com, Waiman.Long@hp.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
riel@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, davidlohr@hp.com,
hpa@zytor.com, andi@firstfloor.org, aswin@hp.com,
scott.norton@hp.com, Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix a race condition in cancelable mcs spinlocks
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 06:24:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140602132454.GO22231@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1406020503000.17105@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:19:39AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 04:46:26PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > > On 1-Jun-14, at 3:20 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > >>If you write to some variable with ACCESS_ONCE and use cmpxchg or xchg
> > > >>at
> > > >>the same time, you break it. ACCESS_ONCE doesn't take the hashed
> > > >>spinlock,
> > > >>so, in this case, cmpxchg or xchg isn't really atomic at all.
> > > >
> > > >And this is really the first place in the kernel that breaks like this?
> > > >I've been using xchg() and cmpxchg() without such consideration for
> > > >quite a while.
> > >
> > > I believe Mikulas is correct. Even in a controlled situation where a
> > > cmpxchg operation
> > > is used to implement pthread_spin_lock() in userspace, we found recently
> > > that the lock
> > > must be released with a cmpxchg operation and not a simple write on SMP
> > > systems.
> > > There is a race in the cache operations or instruction ordering that's not
> > > present with
> > > the ldcw instruction.
> >
> > Oh, I'm not arguing that. He's quite right that its broken, but this
> > form of atomic ops is also quite insane and unusual. Most sane machines
> > don't have this problem.
> >
> > My main concern is how are we going to avoid breaking parisc (and I
> > think sparc32, which is similarly retarded) in the future; we should
> > invest in machinery to find and detect these things.
>
> Grep the kernel for "\<xchg\>" and "\<cmpxchg\>" and replace them with
> atomic types and atomic access functions.
Not so good for pointers, though. Defeats type-checking, for one thing.
An example of this is use of xchg() for atomically enqueuing RCU callbacks
in kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h.
I still like the idea of PA-RISC's compiler implementing ACCESS_ONCE()
as needed to make things work on that architecture.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-02 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-01 17:53 [PATCH] fix a race condition in cancelable mcs spinlocks Mikulas Patocka
2014-06-01 19:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-01 20:46 ` John David Anglin
2014-06-01 21:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-01 21:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-02 9:19 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-06-02 13:24 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-06-02 15:57 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-06-02 16:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-02 19:56 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-03 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 12:53 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-06-02 13:58 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-06-02 14:02 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-06-02 15:39 ` John David Anglin
2014-06-02 10:34 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-06-02 14:14 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-02 15:27 ` Jason Low
2014-06-02 16:00 ` [PATCH v2] introduce atomic_pointer to " Mikulas Patocka
2014-06-02 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-02 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-02 16:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-02 17:33 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-02 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-02 20:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-06-02 21:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-02 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-06-02 22:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-02 22:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-06-02 23:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-02 23:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-06-03 0:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-02 22:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-06-03 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-03 7:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-02 20:24 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-02 16:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-02 17:14 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-02 17:29 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-02 17:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-06-02 17:12 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-02 17:42 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-02 20:46 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-06-02 20:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-06-02 21:12 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-06-03 7:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 11:14 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-06-03 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 14:18 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-06-03 14:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-03 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 15:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-03 7:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-02 21:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-06 15:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-06 15:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-06 15:42 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-02 16:50 ` Jason Low
2014-06-02 17:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-02 17:25 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-02 17:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140602132454.GO22231@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox