Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR

Viresh Kumar
2014-06-03T14:40:03Z

On 28 May 2014 23:08, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> Whatever - I don't think the particular code makes any practical
> difference. We would need to audit existing users who don't have a
> REGULATOR dependency for breakage though.

Exactly what kind of drivers are we looking to fix here? These might
be the possible cases:
- We are checking 'regulator pointer' before calling and don't need to
handle anything there..
- drivers depend on CONFIG_REGULATOR and so again we don't need
to handle anything
- None of above are true and drivers aren't checking return value of
regulator_set_voltage()
OR
They are checking it and failing when it failed..

What do we want to do in these cases?