Re: [PATCH 3.14 186/228] PCI: Wrong register used to check pending traffic

Alex Williamson
2014-06-11T22:07:55Z

On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 15:15 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 16:23 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> 3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >>
> >> ------------------
> >>
> >> From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>
> >> commit d0b4cc4e32705ff00d90d32da7783c266c702c04 upstream.
> >>
> >> The incorrect register offset is passed to pci_wait_for_pending(), which is
> >> caused by commit 157e876ffe ("PCI: Add pci_wait_for_pending() (refactor
> >> pci_wait_for_pending_transaction())").
> >>
> >> Fixes: 157e876ffe ("PCI: Add pci_wait_for_pending() (refactor pci_wait_for_pending_transaction())
> >> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >> Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@gmail.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/pci/pci.c | 5 +++--
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> >> @@ -3043,7 +3043,8 @@ int pci_wait_for_pending_transaction(str
> >> if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
> >> return 1;
> >>
> >> - return pci_wait_for_pending(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_TRPND);
> >> + return pci_wait_for_pending(dev, pci_pcie_cap(dev) + PCI_EXP_DEVSTA,
> >> + PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_TRPND);
> >> }
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_wait_for_pending_transaction);
> >>
> >> @@ -3085,7 +3086,7 @@ static int pci_af_flr(struct pci_dev *de
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> /* Wait for Transaction Pending bit clean */
> >> - if (pci_wait_for_pending(dev, PCI_AF_STATUS, PCI_AF_STATUS_TP))
> >> + if (pci_wait_for_pending(dev, pos + PCI_AF_STATUS, PCI_AF_STATUS_TP))
> >> goto clear;
> >>
> >> dev_err(&dev->dev, "transaction is not cleared; "
> >
> > This still seems to be broken because pci_wait_for_pending() does
> > pci_read_config_word() but PCI_AF_STATUS is not word-aligned.
>
> I agree; this does seem broken. I think pci_read_config_word() will
> return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER without updating the value
> returned, so I think we'll test garbage from the stack.
>
> What do you think, Alex?

Yep, looks broken. The simple fix would be to pass the AF control
offset instead of status, shift the mask, and maybe add a BUG_ON(pos &
1) to pci_read_config_word() to better enforce it. Alternatively we
could make the function take a width and use an appropriate accessor for
the size. I'm inclined to double-check the current users and take the
first option unless anyone objects. Thanks,

Alex