From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751644AbaFEIiM (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2014 04:38:12 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com ([74.125.82.179]:59951 "EHLO mail-we0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750715AbaFEIiJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2014 04:38:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 10:38:04 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Tim Chen , Andrea Arcangeli , Alex Shi , Andi Kleen , Michel Lespinasse , Rik van Riel , Peter Hurley , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E.McKenney" , Jason Low , Aswin Chandramouleeswaran , "Norton, Scott J" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] rwsem: Support optimistic spinning Message-ID: <20140605083804.GF4926@gmail.com> References: <1398205166.6345.7.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <1399055055.6275.15.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1399055055.6275.15.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When trying to apply this patch again I noticed the following detail: > From: Davidlohr Bueso > > [...] > > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso > Signed-off-by: Tim Chen That's not a valid signoff sequence - the person sending the patch should be the last SOB. I've changed it to: Based-on-work-from: Tim Chen Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso which I suspect describes the intention of the SOB line fairly? Thanks, Ingo