public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched,numa: always try to migrate to preferred node at task_numa_placement time
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 19:18:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140606171801.GE11371@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140604163315.1dbc7b56@cuia.bos.redhat.com>

On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 04:33:15PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> It is possible that at task_numa_placement time, the task's
> numa_preferred_nid does not change, but the task is not
> actually running on the preferred node at the time.
> 
> In that case, we still want to attempt migration to the
> preferred node.

So we have that numa_migrate_retry which was supposed to keep kicking
the task until it got where it needed to go.

But now you continuously kick from task_numa_placement().

Clearly the retry thing didn't work, what happened? We got to the
preferred nid, disabled the retry and got moved away again?

Do we want to remove the retry logic in favour of this more aggressive
form?

> @@ -1575,11 +1575,13 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)

> +	if (max_faults) {
> +		/* Set the new preferred node */
> +		if (max_nid != p->numa_preferred_nid)
> +			sched_setnuma(p, max_nid);
> +
> +		if (task_node(p) != p->numa_preferred_nid)
> +			numa_migrate_preferred(p);
>  	}
>  



  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-06 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-04 20:33 [PATCH] sched,numa: always try to migrate to preferred node at task_numa_placement time Rik van Riel
2014-06-06 17:18 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-06-06 18:23   ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-10 15:07     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-19 12:36 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Always try to migrate to preferred node at task_numa_placement() time tip-bot for Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140606171801.GE11371@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox