linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, hpa@zytor.com, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org,
	greg@kroah.com, bp@alien8.de, jkosina@suse.cz,
	chaowang@redhat.com, bhe@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13][V3] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 09:57:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140609015705.GA1924@darkstar.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140606200418.GN1526@redhat.com>

On 06/06/14 at 04:04pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 03:37:48PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 06/05/14 at 11:01am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > 
> > > [..]
> > > > > +	ret = kexec_file_load(kernel_fd, info.initrd_fd, info.command_line,
> > > > > +			info.command_line_len, info.kexec_flags);
> > > > 
> > > > Vivek,
> > > > 
> > > > I tried your patch on my uefi test machine, but kexec load fails like below:
> > > > 
> > > > [root@localhost ~]# kexec -l /boot/vmlinuz-3.15.0-rc8+ --use-kexec2-syscall
> > > > Could not find a free area of memory of 0xa000 bytes ...
> > > 
> > > Hi Dave,
> > > 
> > > I think this message is coming from kexec-tools from old loading path. I
> > > think somehow new path did not even kick in. I tried above and I got
> > > -EBADF as I did not pass initrd. Can you run gdb on kexec and see if
> > > you are getting to syscall or run strace.
> > 
> > Seems I can not reproduce the local hole fail issue but I'm sure it happens
> > before the new syscall callback.
> > 
> > This time I got -ENOEXEC. It's caused by CONFIG_EFI_MIXED=y. In case EFI_MIXED
> > 64bit kernel runs on 32bit efi firmware thus XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G is not
> > set thus bzImage probe will fail with NOEXEC.
> 
> Yep, current bzImage loader only supports loading 64bit image which can
> be loaded above 4G.
> 
> I am wondering how user space implementation is taking care of it. I guess
> we are falling back to 32bit implementation where we use 32bit entry and
> assume that bzImage has to be below 4G.
> 
> We will have to do similar thing in kernel when 32bit loader comes in.
> Compile that in for 64bit kernel and let it handle the case of bzImage
> not being loadable above 4G.

Vivek, I think current implementation is ok to only handle XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G
bzImage.

Matt has sent a patch to revert the EFI_MIXED patch since 32bit loader never load
kernel to above 4G space. So no worry about this issue any more.

Thanks
Dave 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-09  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-03 13:06 [RFC PATCH 00/13][V3] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 01/13] bin2c: Move bin2c in scripts/basic Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 16:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 17:13     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 02/13] kernel: Build bin2c based on config option CONFIG_BUILD_BIN2C Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04  9:13   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 03/13] kexec: Move segment verification code in a separate function Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04  9:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-04 18:47     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04 20:30       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-05 14:05         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-05 14:07           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 04/13] resource: Provide new functions to walk through resources Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04 10:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-05 13:58     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 05/13] kexec: Make kexec_segment user buffer pointer a union Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04 10:34   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 06/13] kexec: New syscall kexec_file_load() declaration Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04 15:18   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-05  9:56   ` WANG Chao
2014-06-05 15:16     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-05 15:22       ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-06  6:34         ` WANG Chao
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 07/13] kexec: Implementation of new syscall kexec_file_load Vivek Goyal
2014-06-05 11:15   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-05 20:17     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-06  2:11       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-06 18:02         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-11 14:13           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-11 17:04             ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-06  6:56   ` WANG Chao
2014-06-06 18:19     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-09  2:11       ` Dave Young
2014-06-09  5:35         ` WANG Chao
2014-06-09 15:41           ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-13  7:50             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-13  8:00               ` WANG Chao
2014-06-13  8:10                 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-13  8:24                   ` WANG Chao
2014-06-13  8:30                     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-13 12:49                 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-13 12:46               ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-13 15:36                 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 17:38                   ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 20:05                     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 20:53                       ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 21:09                         ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 21:25                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-16 21:43                             ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 22:10                               ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 22:49                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-09 15:30         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 08/13] purgatory/sha256: Provide implementation of sha256 in purgaotory context Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 09/13] purgatory: Core purgatory functionality Vivek Goyal
2014-06-05 20:05   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-06 19:51     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-13 10:17       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 17:25         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 20:10           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 10/13] kexec: Load and Relocate purgatory at kernel load time Vivek Goyal
2014-06-10 16:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-11 19:24     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-13 16:14       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 13:07 ` [PATCH 11/13] kexec-bzImage: Support for loading bzImage using 64bit entry Vivek Goyal
2014-06-15 16:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-15 16:56     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-16 20:06     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 20:57       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 21:15         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 21:27           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 21:45             ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-24 17:31     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-24 18:23       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 13:07 ` [PATCH 12/13] kexec: Support for Kexec on panic using new system call Vivek Goyal
2014-06-17 21:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-18 14:20     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:07 ` [PATCH 13/13] kexec: Support kexec/kdump on EFI systems Vivek Goyal
2014-06-18 15:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-18 16:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-18 17:39     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:12 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13][V3] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04  9:22   ` WANG Chao
2014-06-04 17:50     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04 19:39       ` Michael Kerrisk
2014-06-05 14:04         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-06  5:45           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-06-06 18:04             ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-05  8:31   ` Dave Young
2014-06-05 15:01     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-06  7:37       ` Dave Young
2014-06-06 20:04         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-09  1:57           ` Dave Young [this message]
2014-06-06 20:37         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-06 20:58           ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-06 21:00             ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-06 21:02               ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-12  5:42 ` Dave Young
2014-06-12 12:36   ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-17 14:24   ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-18  1:45     ` Dave Young
2014-06-18  1:52       ` Dave Young
2014-06-18 12:40         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 21:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-17 13:24   ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140609015705.GA1924@darkstar.nay.redhat.com \
    --to=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).