From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] auditsc: audit_krule mask accesses need bounds checking
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 15:30:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140609223057.GB18475@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401332999-15167-1-git-send-email-eparis@redhat.com>
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
>
> Fixes an easy DoS and possible information disclosure.
>
> This does nothing about the broken state of x32 auditing.
>
> eparis: If the admin has enabled auditd and has specifically loaded audit
> rules. This bug has been around since before git. Wow...
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/auditsc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Did this patch get dropped somewhere? Isn't it a valid bugfix, or did I
miss a later conversation about this?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-09 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-29 3:09 [PATCH 1/2] auditsc: audit_krule mask accesses need bounds checking Eric Paris
2014-05-29 3:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] audit: do not select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL on x32 Eric Paris
2014-06-09 22:30 ` Greg KH [this message]
2014-06-09 22:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] auditsc: audit_krule mask accesses need bounds checking Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-09 22:46 ` Greg KH
2014-06-09 22:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-10 0:32 ` Greg KH
2014-06-10 0:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-10 0:37 ` Greg KH
2014-06-09 23:35 ` Josh Boyer
2014-06-10 0:31 ` Greg KH
2014-06-10 0:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-10 2:57 ` Greg KH
2014-06-10 4:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-10 4:14 ` Greg KH
2014-06-09 22:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-06-09 22:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-09 23:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-06-10 12:50 ` Eric Paris
2014-06-10 15:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-06-10 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-28 22:21 [PATCH 0/2] Fix auditsc DoS and move it to staging Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] auditsc: audit_krule mask accesses need bounds checking Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140609223057.GB18475@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox