From: Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>
To: <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <clm@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Fix polling on trace_pipe
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 23:06:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140610060637.GA14045@devbig242.prn2.facebook.com> (raw)
ring_buffer_poll_wait() should always put the poll_table to its wait_queue
even there is immediate data available. Otherwise, the following epoll and
read sequence will eventually hang forever:
1. Put some data to make the trace_pipe ring_buffer read ready first
2. epoll_ctl(efd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, trace_pipe_fd, ee)
3. epoll_wait()
4. read(trace_pipe_fd) till EAGAIN
5. Add some more data to the trace_pipe ring_buffer
6. epoll_wait() -> this epoll_wait() will block forever
~ During the epoll_ctl(efd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD,...) call in step 2,
ring_buffer_poll_wait() returns immediately without adding poll_table,
which has poll_table->_qproc pointing to ep_poll_callback(), to its
wait_queue.
~ During the epoll_wait() call in step 3 and step 6,
ring_buffer_poll_wait() cannot add ep_poll_callback() to its wait_queue
because the poll_table->_qproc is NULL and it is how epoll works.
~ When there is new data available in step 6, ring_buffer does not know
it has to call ep_poll_callback() because it is not in its wait queue.
Hence, block forever.
Other poll implementation seems to call poll_wait() unconditionally as the very
first thing to do. For example, tcp_poll() in tcp.c.
Signed-off-by: Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index fd12cc5..a6e64e8 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -613,10 +613,6 @@ int ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
struct rb_irq_work *work;
- if ((cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS && !ring_buffer_empty(buffer)) ||
- (cpu != RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS && !ring_buffer_empty_cpu(buffer, cpu)))
- return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
-
if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS)
work = &buffer->irq_work;
else {
--
1.8.1
next reply other threads:[~2014-06-10 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-10 6:06 Martin Lau [this message]
2014-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH] ring-buffer: Fix polling on trace_pipe Steven Rostedt
2014-06-11 5:58 ` Martin Lau
2014-06-26 18:34 ` Martin Lau
2014-06-27 0:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-27 6:52 ` Martin Lau
2014-07-10 22:20 ` Martin Lau
2014-07-15 19:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-07-15 20:20 ` Martin Lau
2014-07-15 17:32 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140610060637.GA14045@devbig242.prn2.facebook.com \
--to=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox