public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Brad Mouring" <bmouring@ni.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>, Brad Mouring <bmouring@ni.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 1/7] rtmutex: Deobfuscate chain walk
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:57:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140610135721.GA28502@linuxgetsreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140609202335.980283946@linutronix.de>

On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:28:06PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> There is no point to keep the task ref across the check for lock
> owner. Drop the ref before that, so the protection context is clear.
> 
> Found while documenting the chain walk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

I also am not a huge fan of the verbiage of the commit message here.
Steven's makes more sense to me, and you basically say the same thing
in the actual commit message.

Reviewed-by: Brad Mouring <brad.mouring@ni.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-10 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-09 20:28 [patch V3 0/7] rtmutex: Code clarification and optimization Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 1/7] rtmutex: Deobfuscate chain walk Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-09 20:59   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  3:52     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-06-10  3:21   ` Jason Low
2014-06-10 13:57   ` Brad Mouring [this message]
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 2/7] rtmutex: Clarify the boost/deboost part Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  0:37   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  3:22   ` Jason Low
2014-06-10 14:04   ` Brad Mouring
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 4/7] rtmutex: Siplify remove_waiter() Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  0:53   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  3:35     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-06-10  3:44     ` Jason Low
2014-06-10 14:10   ` Brad Mouring
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 3/7] rtmutex: Document pi chain walk Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  0:45   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  3:51     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-06-10 14:21   ` Brad Mouring
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 5/7] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  0:59   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  4:03     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-06-10 17:39     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 7/7] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  1:20   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  3:48     ` Jason Low
2014-06-10 17:41     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10 17:47       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10 20:45         ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10 14:57   ` Brad Mouring
2014-06-10 15:19     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10 17:43       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10 17:51         ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10 20:46           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-09 20:28 ` [patch V3 6/7] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-10  1:04   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10 15:09   ` Brad Mouring
2014-06-10  0:27 ` [patch V3 0/7] rtmutex: Code clarification and optimization Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  0:35   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-10  3:00     ` Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140610135721.GA28502@linuxgetsreal \
    --to=bmouring@ni.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox