From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<rientjes@google.com>, <penberg@kernel.org>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
<mhocko@suse.cz>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v2 8/8] slab: make dead memcg caches discard free slabs immediately
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:18:34 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140610151830.GA8692@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1406100925270.17142@gentwo.org>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:26:19AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>
> > Frankly, I incline to shrinking dead SLAB caches periodically from
> > cache_reap too, because it looks neater and less intrusive to me. Also
> > it has zero performance impact, which is nice.
> >
> > However, Christoph proposed to disable per cpu arrays for dead caches,
> > similarly to SLUB, and I decided to give it a try, just to see the end
> > code we'd have with it.
> >
> > I'm still not quite sure which way we should choose though...
>
> Which one is cleaner?
To shrink dead caches aggressively, we only need to modify cache_reap
(see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/30/271).
To zap object arrays for dead caches (this is what this patch does), we
have to:
- set array_cache->limit to 0 for each per cpu, shared, and alien array
caches on kmem_cache_shrink;
- make cpu/node hotplug paths init new array cache sizes to 0;
- make free paths (__cache_free, cache_free_alien) handle zero array
cache size properly, because currently they doesn't.
So IMO the first one (reaping dead caches periodically) requires less
modifications and therefore is cleaner.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-10 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-06 13:22 [PATCH -mm v2 0/8] memcg/slab: reintroduce dead cache self-destruction Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 1/8] memcg: cleanup memcg_cache_params refcnt usage Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 2/8] memcg: destroy kmem caches when last slab is freed Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 3/8] memcg: mark caches that belong to offline memcgs as dead Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-10 7:48 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 10:06 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 4/8] slub: don't fail kmem_cache_shrink if slab placement optimization fails Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 5/8] slub: make slab_free non-preemptable Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 14:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-09 12:52 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-09 13:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-12 6:58 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-12 10:03 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 6/8] memcg: wait for kfree's to finish before destroying cache Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 7/8] slub: make dead memcg caches discard free slabs immediately Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 14:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-10 8:09 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 10:09 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 13:22 ` [PATCH -mm v2 8/8] slab: " Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-06 14:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-09 13:04 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-10 7:43 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10 10:03 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-10 14:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-10 15:18 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2014-06-11 8:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-11 21:24 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-12 6:53 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-12 10:02 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-06-13 16:34 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140610151830.GA8692@esperanza \
--to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox