From: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matt Porter <matt.porter@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Disable bus's drivers_autoprobe before rootfs has mounted
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:29:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140611032956.GC25082@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140611043507.GA30126@saruman.home>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:35:07PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:10:00PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Let's take USB peripheral as an example, there is a device for
> > > udc, and a device driver for usb gadget driver, at default, we want
> > > the device to be bound to driver automatically, this is what
> > > we have done now. But if there are more than one udcs and gadget
> > > drivers (eg one B port for mass storage, another B port for usb ethernet),
> > > the user may want to have specific binding (eg, udc-0 -> mass storage,
> > > udc-1 -> usb ethernet), so the binding will be established
> > > after rootfs has mounted. (This feature is implementing)
> >
> > Then there better be a way to describe this on the kernel command line
> > (i.e. module paramaters), right? Which is a total mess, why not just
> > not bind anything in this case and let the user pick what they want?
>
> you can also blacklist all gadget drivers and manually probe them or -
> get this - you can refrain from using gadget drivers and use libusbg to
> build the gadget drivers out of raw usb functions, then bind them to the
> UDC of your liking.
>
I am just worried if we change the behaviour of using gadget driver,
can it be accepted by user? If you think it can be accepted if we can
have some docs, we can implement manually binding for gadget driver
from now on.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-11 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-11 2:14 Disable bus's drivers_autoprobe before rootfs has mounted Peter Chen
2014-06-11 4:10 ` Greg KH
2014-06-11 3:23 ` Peter Chen
2014-06-11 19:10 ` Greg KH
2014-06-11 19:27 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-12 6:31 ` Peter Chen
2014-06-12 14:12 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-13 10:15 ` Peter Chen
2014-06-13 14:19 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-16 1:36 ` Peter Chen
2014-06-16 15:00 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-17 2:04 ` Peter Chen
2014-06-11 4:35 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-06-11 3:29 ` Peter Chen [this message]
2014-06-11 19:36 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-06-12 7:02 ` Peter Chen
2014-06-12 16:53 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-06-13 7:30 ` Peter Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140611032956.GC25082@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net \
--to=peter.chen@freescale.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.porter@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox