Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: tidspbridge: Fix function pointer spacing in struct definition

[Jeff Oczek <jeffoczek@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:31:40PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 22:48 -0400, Jeff Oczek wrote:
> > -	 s32(*fread) (void *, size_t, size_t, void *);
> > -	 s32(*fseek) (void *, long, int);
> > -	 s32(*ftell) (void *);
> > -	 s32(*fclose) (void *);
> > -	void *(*fopen) (const char *, const char *);
> > +	 s32 (*fread)(void *, size_t, size_t, void *);
> > +	 s32 (*fseek)(void *, long, int);
> > +	 s32 (*ftell)(void *);
> > +	 s32 (*fclose)(void *);
> > +	void *(*fopen)(const char *, const char *);
> 
> Better would be to describe the arguments with
> variable names and align all the return values
> 
> 	void *(*fopen
> 
> 	s32 (*fread)(void *arg1, size_t val1, size_t val2, void *ptr1);
> 	s32 (*fseek)(void *ptr1, long arg2, int arg3);
> 	s32 (*ftell)(void * ptr);
> 	s32 (*fclose)(void *ptr);
> 	void *(*fopen)(const char *ptr1, const char *ptr2);
> 
> where arg, val, ptr are actually useful descriptors
> 

Thanks Joe.  I was just trying to stay in the scope of making a
really trivial coding style change for the sake of following the
submission process for the first time.  But I'll resend based on
your suggestion.