From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754041AbaFPOsF (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:48:05 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([85.214.48.195]:40051 "EHLO mail.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752098AbaFPOsD (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:48:03 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:47:59 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Alex Williamson Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@horizon.com, eddy0596@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] PCI/iommu: Fix DMA alias problems Message-ID: <20140616144759.GC18986@8bytes.org> References: <20140522230230.2856.40017.stgit@bling.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140522230230.2856.40017.stgit@bling.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-DSPAM-Result: Whitelisted X-DSPAM-Processed: Mon Jun 16 16:48:00 2014 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9984 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 539f03a020869010118446 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alex, On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 05:07:23PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > Alex Williamson (16): > PCI: Add DMA alias iterator > PCI: define pci_dev_flags as bit shifts > PCI: quirk pci_for_each_dma_alias() > PCI: quirk dma_alias_devfn for Ricoh devices > PCI: quirk dma_alias_devfn for Marvell devices > PCI: Quirk pci_for_each_dma_alias() for bridges > PCI: Add quirks for ASMedia and Tundra bridges > iommu: Create central IOMMU group lookup/creation interface > iommu/amd: Update to use PCI DMA aliases > iommu/amd: Use iommu_group_get_for_dev() > iommu/intel: Use iommu_group_get_for_dev() > iommu/intel: Update to use PCI DMA aliases > iommu/fsl: Use iommu_group_get_for_dev() for IOMMU groups > iommu: Remove pci.h > PCI: Remove pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge() > PCI: Remove pci_get_dma_source() Sorry for the delay, I had a look at the generic IOMMU and the AMD part now. It looks good to me so far, but I still have to review the VT-d changes and give it all some testing on my machines. I really like the code simplification in the IOMMU drivers and also feel more comfortable when the IVRS table is still taken into consideration for getting aliases. Joerg