From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: josh@joshtriplett.org
Cc: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>,
davidshan@tencent.com, cl@linux.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: use __this_cpu_read helper instead of per_cpu_ptr(p, raw_smp_processor_id())
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:22:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140619212212.GR4904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140619201702.GE16404@cloud>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 01:17:02PM -0700, josh@joshtriplett.org wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 04:12:46PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> > Use __this_cpu_read() instead of per_cpu_ptr() for optimized access.
> >
> > Last time when Shan Wei posted this, you wanted before/after code for ARM and x86.
> > (http://lkml.iu.edu//hypermail/linux/kernel/1211.2/00498.html).
> >
> > There are few other location which use per_cpu_ops instead of this_cpu_ops. I
> > can convert them accordingly if you are accept this :)
>
> Please do.
>
> > Using gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.3-12ubuntu1) 4.7.3, I get (trimmed to relevant assembly, from make kernel/rcu/tree.s)
> >
> > ARMv7 per_cpu_ptr():
> >
> > force_quiescent_state:
> > mov r3, sp @,
> > bic r1, r3, #8128 @ tmp171,,
> > ldr r2, .L98 @ tmp169,
> > bic r1, r1, #63 @ tmp170, tmp171,
> > ldr r3, [r0, #220] @ __ptr, rsp_6(D)->rda
> > ldr r1, [r1, #20] @ D.35903_68->cpu, D.35903_68->cpu
> > mov r6, r0 @ rsp, rsp
> > ldr r2, [r2, r1, asl #2] @ tmp173, __per_cpu_offset
> > add r3, r3, r2 @ tmp175, __ptr, tmp173
> > ldr r5, [r3, #12] @ rnp_old, D.29162_13->mynode
> >
> > ARMv7 using __this_cpu_read():
> >
> > force_quiescent_state:
> > ldr r3, [r0, #220] @ rsp_7(D)->rda, rsp_7(D)->rda
> > mov r6, r0 @ rsp, rsp
> > add r3, r3, #12 @ __ptr, rsp_7(D)->rda,
> > ldr r5, [r2, r3] @ rnp_old, *D.29176_13
> >
> > Using gcc 4.8.2:
> >
> > x86_64 per_cpu_ptr():
> >
> > movl %gs:cpu_number,%edx # cpu_number, pscr_ret__
> > movslq %edx, %rdx # pscr_ret__, pscr_ret__
> > movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rdx,8), %rdx # __per_cpu_offset, tmp93
> > movq %rdi, %r13 # rsp, rsp
> > movq 1000(%rdi), %rax # rsp_9(D)->rda, __ptr
> > movq 24(%rdx,%rax), %r12 # _15->mynode, rnp_old
> >
> > x86_64 __this_cpu_read():
> >
> > movq %rdi, %r13 # rsp, rsp
> > movq 1000(%rdi), %rax # rsp_9(D)->rda, rsp_9(D)->rda
> > movq %gs:24(%rax),%r12 # _10->mynode, rnp_old
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <davidshan@tencent.com>
> > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Queued for 3.17!
Thanx, Paul
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index f1ba773..c6de285 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > struct rcu_node *rnp_old = NULL;
> >
> > /* Funnel through hierarchy to reduce memory contention. */
> > - rnp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id())->mynode;
> > + rnp = __this_cpu_read(rsp->rda->mynode);
> > for (; rnp != NULL; rnp = rnp->parent) {
> > ret = (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
> > !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->fqslock);
> > --
> > 2.0.0
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-19 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-19 20:12 [PATCH 1/1] rcu: use __this_cpu_read helper instead of per_cpu_ptr(p, raw_smp_processor_id()) Pranith Kumar
2014-06-19 20:17 ` josh
2014-06-19 21:22 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-06-19 21:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140619212212.GR4904@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davidshan@tencent.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox