From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, dave.hansen@intel.com,
cl@gentwo.org, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu] Reduce overhead of cond_resched() checks for RCU
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 08:49:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140623154931.GF8178@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140623062615.GB19860@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
> On the topic of these threads; I recently noticed RCU grew a metric ton
> of them, I found some 75 rcu kthreads on my box, wth up with that?
It seems like RCU is growing in complexity all the time.
Can it be put on a diet in general?
No more new CONFIGs please either.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-23 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-21 2:59 [PATCH tip/core/rcu] Reduce overhead of cond_resched() checks for RCU Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-21 4:29 ` Josh Triplett
2014-06-21 6:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 13:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-23 15:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 6:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 13:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 13:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-23 16:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 15:49 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2014-06-23 16:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 17:19 ` Andi Kleen
2014-06-23 17:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 16:55 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-23 17:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 17:34 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-23 17:17 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-23 18:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 23:30 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-24 0:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-24 0:20 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-24 0:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-24 16:18 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-24 20:43 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-24 21:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140623154931.GF8178@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
--to=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox