From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, cl@gentwo.org, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu] Reduce overhead of cond_resched() checks for RCU
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:39:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140624003934.GR4603@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A8C44E.7050000@intel.com>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 05:20:30PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 06/23/2014 05:15 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity, how many CPUs does your system have? 80?
> > If 160, looks like something bad is happening at 80.
>
> 80 cores, 160 threads. >80 processes/threads is where we start using
> the second thread on the cores. The tasks are also pinned to
> hyperthread pairs, so they disturb each other, and the scheduler moves
> them between threads on occasion which causes extra noise.
OK, that could explain the near flattening of throughput near 80
processes. Is 3.16.0-rc1-pf2 with the two RCU patches? If so, is the
new sysfs parameter at its default value?
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-24 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-21 2:59 [PATCH tip/core/rcu] Reduce overhead of cond_resched() checks for RCU Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-21 4:29 ` Josh Triplett
2014-06-21 6:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 13:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-23 15:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 6:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 13:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 13:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-06-23 16:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 15:49 ` Andi Kleen
2014-06-23 16:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 17:19 ` Andi Kleen
2014-06-23 17:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 16:55 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-23 17:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 17:34 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-23 17:17 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-23 18:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 23:30 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-24 0:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-24 0:20 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-24 0:39 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-06-24 16:18 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-24 20:43 ` Dave Hansen
2014-06-24 21:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140624003934.GR4603@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox