public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>, "X86 ML" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Eric Paris" <eparis@redhat.com>,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"security@kernel.org" <security@kernel.org>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Roland McGrath" <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_32,entry: Do syscall exit work on badsys (CVE-2014-4508)
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 23:18:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140624211802.GC15068@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUStJFrCJBO-QRzn7mbdUgbnFgzYNspiVKORMsU6DMDKw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 01:53:25PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> It confirms my sense that no one knows how to test this stuff :-/
> It's pretty clear that no one has ever extensively hammered it.

Someone might've known at some point but who knows who knew. :-)

> I wonder how much could be effectively rewritten in C. I'm thinking of
> redoing most of the entry work in C, but that won't help here.

Whatever you do, you'll have to do testing yourself, I'm afraid, here
too. And then, after the patch is long committed and forgotten, someone
would resurface complaining that it breaks some obscure use case.

Eeh, the sad life of a kernel developer. :-\

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-24 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-16 16:33 3.15: kernel BUG at kernel/auditsc.c:1525! Toralf Förster
2014-06-16 17:21 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-06-16 17:25   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-16 17:29     ` Richard Weinberger
2014-06-16 17:32       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-16 17:36         ` Toralf Förster
2014-06-16 17:50           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-16 17:59             ` Toralf Förster
2014-06-16 18:15               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-16 18:21                 ` Toralf Förster
2014-06-16 18:24                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-16 18:36                     ` Toralf Förster
2014-06-16 20:41                     ` Toralf Förster
2014-06-16 20:43                       ` Richard Weinberger
2014-06-16 21:35                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-16 21:48                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-16 21:54                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-16 21:58                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-16 22:00                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-20 15:41                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-20 17:35                               ` Toralf Förster
2014-06-23 21:04                               ` Josh Boyer
2014-06-23 21:22                                 ` [PATCH] x86_32,entry: Do syscall exit work on badsys (CVE-2014-4508) Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-23 22:18                                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86_32, entry: Do syscall exit work on badsys ( CVE-2014-4508) tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-24 10:51                                   ` [PATCH] x86_32,entry: Do syscall exit work on badsys (CVE-2014-4508) Borislav Petkov
2014-06-24 20:53                                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-24 21:18                                       ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2014-07-01 10:52                                   ` Quentin Casasnovas
2014-07-01 14:14                                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-17 15:38                           ` 3.15: kernel BUG at kernel/auditsc.c:1525! Toralf Förster
2014-06-17 16:19                             ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140624211802.GC15068@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox