From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754665AbaFYGP7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 02:15:59 -0400 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.110]:37608 "EHLO e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752615AbaFYGP6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 02:15:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:15:51 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: David Rientjes Cc: Andrew Morton , Ian Kent , Hendrik Brueckner , Thorsten Diehl , Andrea Righi , Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , Stefan Bader , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] /proc/stat vs. failed order-4 allocation Message-ID: <20140625061551.GA4260@osiris> References: <1402909492-36486-1-git-send-email-heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> <20140618142931.857d57fe0007a361404f6cab@linux-foundation.org> <20140621091058.GC3463@osiris> <20140623160414.f64bcfbfc3f40b4844552427@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14062506-1948-0000-0000-0000004FC75D Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:52:22PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:10:58 +0200 Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > I'm unclear on how urgent these fixes are. I semi-randomly tagged them > > > > for 3.16 with a -stable backport, but that could be changed? > > > > > > I assume tagged for 3.16 means you intend to get it merged before 3.16 > > > gets released? > > > If so, then that would be fine with me. > > > > um, actually, no, sorry, I meant merge for 3.17-rc1 with a -stable backport. > > > > We can do 3.16 of course, but for what reasons? > > Heiko's patches should also fix > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1319244 as reported > by Stefan Bader. I've pinged them to determine if there is any other > issues with -mm. The other distribution where this has been seen was RHEL7 (on s390). FWIW, I thought there was a 'rule' that patches with a -stable tag shouldn't stay in -next for a couple of rc releases. But then again that probably was just a discussion somewhere. Anyway, if neither Stefan or Ian speak up I'm fine with post 3.16 as well.