From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmu_notifier and i915_gem_userptr.c
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:18:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140625221859.GD7732@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140620114350.GH31771@8bytes.org>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 01:43:50PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Change_pte is also called when the underlying page of an address
> changes in the kernel which would matter for DMA. But that can only
> happen in KSM and uprobes code which is probably not of interest for the
> i915 driver.
>
> The other case where I think it matters is the do_wp_page() path for
> COW. The code works by calling invalidate_range_start -> change_pte ->
> invalidate_range_end. Your driver would react to this by unbinding the
> vma from itself internally (after a fork for example).
>
> But I have to check whether this really matters here.
Okay, I think it does not matter for the i915 driver. The code-paths
which map pages read-only for COW invoke invalidate_range_start/end on
the page-ranges which causes the driver to unbind the pages.
When get_user_pages() is called again later it will do the COW by
itself, so the driver doesn't need to care.
So I tend to say that the i915 driver does not need a change_pte()
call-back at all. But probably someone should double-check to make sure
I didn't miss something.
Joerg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-25 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-19 15:36 mmu_notifier and i915_gem_userptr.c Joerg Roedel
2014-06-19 16:02 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-20 11:43 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-06-25 22:18 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140625221859.GD7732@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox