From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932260AbaF3QUY (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:20:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18302 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932237AbaF3QUV (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:20:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:18:37 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Josh Triplett , Lai Jiangshan , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] rcu: uninline rcu_lock_acquire() and rcu_lock_release() Message-ID: <20140630161837.GA15873@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, May be correct this time ;) Based on paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/next. 2/2 is new and hopefully trivial. But! the numbers look suspiciously good, I do not understand where does the difference come from... Oleg. include/linux/rcupdate.h | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- include/linux/srcu.h | 6 ++-- kernel/rcu/rcu.h | 6 ++-- kernel/rcu/update.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)