From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com>
Cc: <balbi@ti.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<m.szyprowski@samsung.com>, <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: add claimed field in struct usb_ep
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:33:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140630183337.GS31442@saruman.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A96C23.8040800@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1874 bytes --]
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:16:35PM +0200, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> On 06/23/2014 08:27 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 08:07:43AM +0200, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> >> On 06/19/2014 05:08 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:20:36AM +0200, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> >>>> This field allows to mark ep as claimed in more clear way. Claiming
> >>>> endpoint by setting driver_data to non-null value is leaky solution
> >>>> and makes code unreadable.
> >>>
> >>> how come ? How can it be unreadable ? how can it be leaky ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> What if gadget will not assign any value to driver_data (just like
> >> Gadget Zero do)? Endpoint will be seen as not used, and autoconfig will
> >
> > huh ??? The gadget isn't the endpoint user, the function is. Look at
> > f_sourcesink.c and f_loopback.c. If the function doesn't set anything to
> > driver_data, then that's a bug on the function which needs fixing.
> >
> > Moreover, if there's a function which doesn't set driver_data, we could
> > just as well have a function which doesn't set "claimed", so the problem
> > is the same.
> >
>
> I mean the function, not the gadget. Sorry for confusion.
> Mechanism I developed marks endpoint as claimed *inside autoconfig
> function*. It's significant difference, because there's not possible to
> forget to mark that endpoint is claimed. When endpoint is returned from
> autoconfig function, it belongs to function, and the function doesn't
> need to do anything to claim obtained endpoint - it's already done.
we still might need to keep driver_data though. Some functions might
need it. But now that you explained your goal, I can see how that might
help. Please send a complete patchset also with the implementation for
ep_autoconfig so we can all review your idea.
cheers
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-30 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-16 8:20 [PATCH] usb: gadget: add claimed field in struct usb_ep Robert Baldyga
2014-06-19 15:08 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-06-23 6:07 ` Robert Baldyga
2014-06-23 18:27 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-06-24 12:16 ` Robert Baldyga
2014-06-30 18:33 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2014-07-01 6:05 ` Robert Baldyga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140630183337.GS31442@saruman.home \
--to=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=andrzej.p@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=r.baldyga@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox