linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use a seperate syscall table as a few syscalls need to be using the compat syscalls.
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:05:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140701150539.GA18309@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400914939-9708-23-git-send-email-apinski@cavium.com>

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:02:17AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index 1e1ebfc..8241ffe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -620,9 +620,14 @@ ENDPROC(ret_from_fork)
>   */
>  	.align	6
>  el0_svc:
> -	adrp	stbl, sys_call_table		// load syscall table pointer
>  	uxtw	scno, w8			// syscall number in w8
>  	mov	sc_nr, #__NR_syscalls
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ILP32
> +	get_thread_info tsk
> +	ldr	x16, [tsk, #TI_FLAGS]
> +	tbnz	x16, #TIF_32BIT_AARCH64, el0_ilp32_svc // We are using ILP32
> +#endif
> +	adrp	stbl, sys_call_table		// load syscall table pointer

This adds a slight penalty on the AArch64 SVC entry path. I can't tell
whether that's visible or not but I think the x86 guys decided to set an
extra bit to the syscall number to distinguish it from native calls.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_ilp32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_ilp32.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1da1d11
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_ilp32.c
[...]
> +/*
> + * Wrappers to pass the pt_regs argument.
> + */
> +#define sys_rt_sigreturn sys_rt_sigreturn_wrapper
> +
> +
> +/* Using Compat syscalls where necessary */
> +#define sys_ioctl		compat_sys_ioctl
> +/* iovec */
> +#define sys_readv		compat_sys_readv
> +#define sys_writev		compat_sys_writev
> +#define sys_preadv		compat_sys_preadv64
> +#define sys_pwritev		compat_sys_pwritev64
> +#define sys_vmsplice		compat_sys_vmsplice

Do these actually work? compat_iovec has two members of 32-bit each
while the ILP32 iovec has a void * (32-bit) and a __kernel_size_t which
is 64-bit.

> +/* robust_list_head */
> +#define sys_set_robust_list	compat_sys_set_robust_list
> +#define sys_get_robust_list	compat_sys_get_robust_list

Same here, we have a size_t * argument. The compat function would write
back 32-bit but size_t is 64-bit for ILP32.

> +/* kexec_segment */
> +#define sys_kexec_load		compat_sys_kexec_load

More size_t members in the kexec_segment structure (but we don't yet
have kexec on arm64).

> +/* struct msghdr */
> +#define sys_recvfrom		compat_sys_recvfrom

Why compat here? struct sockaddr seems to be the same as the native one.

> +#define sys_recvmmsg		compat_sys_recvmmsg
> +#define sys_sendmmsg		compat_sys_sendmmsg
> +#define sys_sendmsg		compat_sys_sendmsg
> +#define sys_recvmsg		compat_sys_recvmsg

These get messier as well with a different size_t affecting struct
msghdr.

> +#define sys_setsockopt		compat_sys_setsockopt
> +#define sys_getsockopt		compat_sys_getsockopt

Looking at the sock_getsockopt() function, we have a union v copied
to/from user. However, such a union contains a struct timeval which for
ILP32 would be different than the compat one.

> +/* iovec */
> +#define sys_process_vm_readv	compat_sys_process_vm_readv
> +#define sys_process_vm_writev	compat_sys_process_vm_writev

See above for iovec.

> +/* Pointer in struct */
> +#define sys_mount               compat_sys_mount

Which structure is this?

> +/* Scheduler */
> +/* unsigned long bitmaps */
> +#define sys_sched_setaffinity   compat_sys_sched_setaffinity
> +#define sys_sched_getaffinity   compat_sys_sched_getaffinity

Does the long bitmask matter here? I can see the length is passed in
bytes.

> +/* iov usage */
> +#define sys_keyctl              compat_sys_keyctl

Same problem as iovec above.

> +/* aio */
> +/* Pointer to Pointer  */
> +#define sys_io_setup		compat_sys_io_setup

sys_io_setup takes a pointer to aio_context_t which is defined as
__kernel_ulong_t (same as LP64).

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-01 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-24  7:01 [PATCHv2 00/24] ILP32 Support in ARM64 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:01 ` [PATCH 01/24] ARM64: Force LP64 to compile the kernel Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:01 ` [PATCH 02/24] ARM64: Rename COMPAT to AARCH32_EL0 in Kconfig Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:01 ` [PATCH 03/24] ARM64: Change some CONFIG_COMPAT over to use CONFIG_AARCH32_EL0 instead Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 15:15   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:01 ` [PATCH 04/24] ARM64:ILP32: Set kernel_long to long long so we can reuse most of the same syscalls as LP64 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 05/24] ARM64:UAPI: Set the correct __BITS_PER_LONG for ILP32 Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 15:22   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 15:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 06/24] Allow for some signal structures to be the same between a 32bit ABI and the 64bit ABI Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 15:43   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 07/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use the same size and layout of the signal structures for ILP32 as for LP64 Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 15:58   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 08/24] Allow a 32bit ABI to use the naming of the 64bit ABI syscalls to avoid confusion of not splitting the registers Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 16:22   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 09/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use the same syscall names as LP64 Andrew Pinski
2014-06-18  8:51   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 10/24] ARM64: Introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread. Use them in the correct locations Andrew Pinski
2014-06-18 17:47   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 11/24] ARM64: Add ARM64_ILP32 to Kconfig Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 12/24] ARM64: Add is_ilp32_compat_task and is_ilp32_compat_thread and TIF_32BIT_AARCH64 Andrew Pinski
2014-06-19 12:49   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 13/24] Drivers:input: Use is_compat_task for ARM64 also Andrew Pinski
2014-06-19 12:50   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 14/24] ARM64:ILP32: COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME is true for ILP32 tasks Andrew Pinski
2014-06-19 12:52   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 15/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use the non compat HWCAP for ILP32 Andrew Pinski
2014-06-19 12:54   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 13:01   ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 16/24] ARM64:ILP32 use the standard start_thread for ILP32 so the processor state is not AARCH32 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 17/24] ARM64:ILP32: Support core dump for ILP32 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 18/24] ARM64: Add loading of ILP32 binaries Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 19/24] ARM64: Add vdso for ILP32 and use it for the signal return Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 20/24] ptrace: Allow compat to use the native siginfo Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 21/24] ARM64:ILP32: The native siginfo is used instead of the compat siginfo Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 18:56   ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 22/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use a seperate syscall table as a few syscalls need to be using the compat syscalls Andrew Pinski
2014-07-01 15:05   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-07-01 15:30     ` Pinski, Andrew
2014-07-01 16:38       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 16:50         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 17:04           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 16:49       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 23/24] ARM64:ILP32: Fix signal return for ILP32 when the user modified the signal stack Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24  7:02 ` [PATCH 24/24] Add documentation about ARM64 ILP32 ABI Andrew Pinski
2014-06-16 17:08 ` [PATCHv2 00/24] ILP32 Support in ARM64 Catalin Marinas
2014-06-16 17:19   ` Pinski, Andrew
2014-06-17 10:43     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 11:30       ` Pinski, Andrew

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140701150539.GA18309@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=apinski@cavium.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).