linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [patch]blk-mq: suppress a warning
@ 2014-07-04 11:26 Shaohua Li
  2014-07-04 15:35 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shaohua Li @ 2014-07-04 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: axboe


The warning is hit when cpu hotplug is running. After scheduler puts a cpu
online and before blk-mq mapping reinit, a task can queue a request and run the
queue. At that time the cpu isn't in hctx->cpumask, but the cpu is mapped into
hctx 0. When the race happens, hctx->cpumask doesn't set the cpu and
ctx->index_hw/hctx->nr_ctx isn't correct, but it doesn't cause any problem. So
just suppress the warning here.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index ad69ef6..22f314e 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 	LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
 	int queued;
 
-	WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask));
+	WARN_ON(q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, raw_smp_processor_id()) != hctx);
 
 	if (unlikely(test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->state)))
 		return;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [patch] blk-mq: suppress a warning
@ 2015-01-06 16:04 Jeff Moyer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Moyer @ 2015-01-06 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, Shaohua Li; +Cc: linux-kernel

Jens,

Is there any reason the following patch from Shaohua didn't go in?  We
are hitting this WARN_ON during hotplug testing, and this patch fixes
the problem.  The previous posting is located here:

http://linux-kernel.2935.n7.nabble.com/patch-blk-mq-suppress-a-warning-td895340.html

Cheers,
Jeff

From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>

The warning is hit when cpu hotplug is running. After scheduler puts a cpu
online and before blk-mq mapping reinit, a task can queue a request and run the
queue. At that time the cpu isn't in hctx->cpumask, but the cpu is mapped into
hctx 0. When the race happens, hctx->cpumask doesn't set the cpu and
ctx->index_hw/hctx->nr_ctx isn't correct, but it doesn't cause any problem. So
just suppress the warning here.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index da1ab56..491beb7 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 	struct list_head *dptr;
 	int queued;
 
-	WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask));
+	WARN_ON(q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, raw_smp_processor_id()) != hctx);
 
 	if (unlikely(test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->state)))
 		return;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-06 16:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-04 11:26 [patch]blk-mq: suppress a warning Shaohua Li
2014-07-04 15:35 ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-06 16:04 [patch] blk-mq: " Jeff Moyer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).