public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "xiaofeng.yan" <xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	xiaofeng.yan2012@gmail.com, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: overrun could happen in start_hrtick_dl
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 10:41:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140707084150.GC19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404475341-22536-1-git-send-email-xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2139 bytes --]

On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 12:02:21PM +0000, xiaofeng.yan wrote:
> It could be wrong for the precision of runtime and deadline
> when the precision is within microsecond level. For example:
> Task runtime deadline period
>  P1   200us   500us   500us
> 
> This case need enbale HRTICK feature by the next command
> PC#echo "HRTICK" > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features
> PC#./schedtool -E -t 200000:500000 -e ./test&
> PC#trace-cmd record -e sched_switch

Are you actually using HRTICK ?

> Some of runtime and deadline run with millisecond level by
> reading kernershark.
> The problem is caused by a conditional judgment "delta > 10000".
> Because no hrtimer start up to control the runtime when runtime is less than 10us.
> So the process will continue to run until tick-period coming.
> For fixing this problem, Let delta is equal to 10us when it is less than 10us.
> So the hrtimer will start up to control the end of process.
> 
> Signed-off-by: xiaofeng.yan <xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com>

Always when sending patches for deadline, also CC Juri.

> ---
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c |    6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index fc4f98b1..dfefa82 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -997,10 +997,8 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK
>  static void start_hrtick_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  {
> -	s64 delta = p->dl.dl_runtime - p->dl.runtime;
> -
> -	if (delta > 10000)
> -		hrtick_start(rq, p->dl.runtime);
> +	s64 delta = p->dl.runtime > 10000 ? p->dl.runtime : 10000;
> +	hrtick_start(rq, delta);

Yeah, that looks funny. And seeing how the only other user does
something similar:

hrtick_start_fair()
	delta = max(10000ULL, delta)
	hrtick_start(rq, delta)


Does it make sense to move this max() into hrtick_start()?

Also; and I don't think you mentioned that but did fix, the argument to
hrtick_start() is wrong, it should be the delta, not the absolute
timeout.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-07  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-04 12:02 [PATCH] sched/rt: overrun could happen in start_hrtick_dl xiaofeng.yan
2014-07-07  8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-07-08  1:10   ` xiaofeng.yan
2014-07-08  2:40     ` Li Zefan
2014-07-08  2:51       ` xiaofeng.yan
2014-07-08  7:49         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-08  8:41           ` xiaofeng.yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140707084150.GC19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaofeng.yan2012@gmail.com \
    --cc=xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox