From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753030AbaGGMRH (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2014 08:17:07 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:59504 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752917AbaGGMRF (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2014 08:17:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:16:54 +0100 From: Richard Fitzgerald To: broonie@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.de Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: add SOC_VALUE_ENUM_EXT Message-ID: <20140707121644.GA26105@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adds an equivalent of SOC_ENUM_EXT for value enums Strictly speaking SOC_ENUM_EXT can also be used to define a value enum since the only difference is the get and set functions. But this doesn't look good in code because it is inconsistent with the normal control definitions. Adding a specific SOC_VALUE_ENUM_EXT is better for code clarity. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald --- include/sound/soc.h | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/sound/soc.h b/include/sound/soc.h index 9a5b4f6..1483920 100644 --- a/include/sound/soc.h +++ b/include/sound/soc.h @@ -248,6 +248,8 @@ .info = snd_soc_info_enum_double, \ .get = xhandler_get, .put = xhandler_put, \ .private_value = (unsigned long)&xenum } +#define SOC_VALUE_ENUM_EXT(xname, xenum, xhandler_get, xhandler_put) \ + SOC_ENUM_EXT(xname, xenum, xhandler_get, xhandler_put) #define SND_SOC_BYTES(xname, xbase, xregs) \ { .iface = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_MIXER, .name = xname, \ -- 1.7.2.5